Live data from Hacker News

Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

apple.com

161–170 of 1001 posts

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#162

Since these won't ship in non-Apple products, I don't see really the point. They're only slightly ahead of AMD products when it comes to performance/watt, slightly behind performance/dollar (in an Apples to apples comparison on similarly configured laptops), and that's only because Apple is head of AMD at TSMC for new nodes, not because Apple has any inherent advantage. I have huge respect for the PA Semi team, but t…

ARM going mainstream in powerful personal computers was exciting enough as it was, with the release of the Apple Silicon M1. With time hopefully these will be good to use with Linux.

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow, I had no idea M1 doesn't support eGPUs. I was planning on buying an external enclosure for Apple Silicon when I upgraded; thanks for pointing that out.

Not only that, but you're stuck with cards from 5 years ago with current macbooks. It's a shame too because the plug and play support is better than the very best e-gpu plug and play on linux or windows. I don't see Apple personally adding support any time soon, either. Clearly their play now is to make all hardware in house. The last thing they want is people connecting 3090s so they can have an M1 Max gaming rig. T…

You could use the new AMD cards at least though right? I don't think Nvidia support will ever happen again though (I got burned by that, bought a 1060 right before they dropped Nvidia).

I'm on a RX 5700XT with my Hackintosh, and it works well.

Edit: Thinking about this more.. I bet third party GPUs are a dead end for users and Apple is planning to phase them out.

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#164
post #135
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And NVMe with 7.5gbps are like, we are almost not even note worthy haha Impressive all around.

It's not that noteworthy, given that affordable Samsung 980 Pro SSDs have been doing those speeds for well over a year now.

980 pro maxes at 7.

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not going to wait for the comparisons this time. Maxing this baby out right now.

Honest question, what do you do where a $6,099 laptop is justifiable?

If you don't max out the HDD space, but max out all the portions which effect performance, it only about half that.

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#166

I think the M1 Max has more transistors than any commercially available CPU or GPU? In a $3499 laptop!

57 billion transistors? a 5950x has under 20 a 3060ti has under 20 are they counting the RAM?

Does either have a 10 core CPU or large cache memory?

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#168
post #105

"Apple’s Commitment to the Environment" > Today, Apple is carbon neutral for global corporate operations, and by 2030, plans to have net-zero climate impact across the entire business, which includes manufacturing supply chains and all product life cycles. This also means that every chip Apple creates, from design to manufacturing, will be 100 percent carbon neutral. But what they won't do is put the chip in an expan…

>But what they won't do is put the chip in an expandable and repairable system so that you don't have to discard and replace it every few years. This renders the carbon-neutrality of the chips meaningless. It's not the chip, it's the packaging that is massively unfriendly to the environment, stupid.

Mac computers last way longer than their PC counterparts.

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

400GB/s available to the CPU cores in a unified memory, that is going to really help certain workloads that are very memory dominant on modern architectures. Both Intel and AMD are solving this with ever increasing L3 cache sizes but just using attached memory in a SOC has vastly higher memory bandwidth potential and probably better latency too especially on work that doesn't fit in ~32MB of L3 cache.

The M1 still uses DDR memory at the end of the day, it's just physically closer to the core. This is in contrast to L3 which is actual SRAM on the core. The DDR being closer to the core may or may not allow the memory to run at higher speeds due to better signal integrity, but you can purchase DDR4-5333 today whereas the M1 uses 4266. The real advantage is the M1 Max uses 8 channels, which is impressive considering t…

Apple also uses massive cache sizes, compared to the industry.

They put a 32 megabyte system level cache in their latest phone chip.

>at 32MB, the new A15 dwarfs the competition’s implementations, such as the 3MB SLC on the Snapdragon 888 or the estimated 6-8MB SLC on the Exynos 2100

https://www.anandtech.com/show/16983/the-apple-a15-soc-perfo...

It will be interesting to see how big they go on these chips.

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#170
post #105

"Apple’s Commitment to the Environment" > Today, Apple is carbon neutral for global corporate operations, and by 2030, plans to have net-zero climate impact across the entire business, which includes manufacturing supply chains and all product life cycles. This also means that every chip Apple creates, from design to manufacturing, will be 100 percent carbon neutral. But what they won't do is put the chip in an expan…

Apple, the company that requires the entire panel to be replaced by design when a 6 dollar display cable malfunctions, is proud to announce its latest marketing slogan for a better environment.
Post reply on HN