Live data from Hacker News

Interview with CEO of rsync.net: “no firewalls and no routers”

console.dev

161–170 of 343 posts

Re: Interview with CEO of rsync.net: “no firewalls and no routers”

#161
post #159

Meta: I really dislike the style of console.dev, the article is shunted to the left and leaves the rest of the screen real estate to be taken up by an - albeit pretty - but unnecessary piece of digital artwork. This - https://ibb.co/nzbFxjW - is what the article looks like on my ultrawide which made for very uncomfortable viewing

Not sure why you couldn’t just resize the window here?

Re: Interview with CEO of rsync.net: “no firewalls and no routers”

#162
post #38
post #21

Really well done interview, some real interesting bits in there. One part concerned me though, in the interview, it mentions "we own (and have built) all of our own platform." and it fails to mention a few critically important key parts of a storage platform, first being encryption. How are personal files being handled? Is encryption being used? Are you able to access this data using a shared key? As well as continge…

"How are personal files being handled? Is encryption being used? Are you able to access this data using a shared key?" We give you an empty UNIX filesystem. So, if you push up files over rsync or sftp, they will sit here unencrypted. However , there are now excellent "tools like rsync that encrypt the remote result with a key rsync.net never sees" - chief among them being 'borg'[1]. Other options include duplicity an…

Once ZoL hits in 13 are you planning to give users direct access to ZFS for encrypted filesystems? My goal is to have a remote ZFS host I can push my snapshots to without loading the keys remotely. That would give me emergency access to the files if I load the key (less preferable), but mostly the ability to receive all the remote filesystems+snapshots to local storage with the flexibility of ZFS tooling. Right now I encrypt the incremental snapshot streams and archive them on traditional backup systems which doesn't allow the same flexibility or assurance.

I'd be happy with a socket/pipe to 'zfs recv zpool/benlivengood/data' that I could throw send-stream data at once a day or so.

Re: Interview with CEO of rsync.net: “no firewalls and no routers”

#163
post #159

Meta: I really dislike the style of console.dev, the article is shunted to the left and leaves the rest of the screen real estate to be taken up by an - albeit pretty - but unnecessary piece of digital artwork. This - https://ibb.co/nzbFxjW - is what the article looks like on my ultrawide which made for very uncomfortable viewing

Not sure why you couldn’t just resize the window here?

I can, however I don't think having to resize your browser window to comfortably view an article is a very good UX, especially when it could be rectified by positioning the content in the middle of the screen.

Re: Interview with CEO of rsync.net: “no firewalls and no routers”

#165

You write down that you have no router, though your primary US location is connected to a "quintuple-homed network" and all global locations are at least triple-homed. What does that mean exactly? Is your IP provider quintuple-homed? Or are you running a bit more complicated setup than you explain but the gist is that you have no particular routing mechanisms? What does that say regarding your high availability? If o…

The primary US location, in San Diego[1], gives us a managed, blended bandwidth product which is, in fact, quintuple homed and has been since we moved in (2001).

So we have a dumb switch in our rack, but they have routers.

In 2021 that's a weird bandwidth product and a weird setup but in 2001 it was "normal" and we just stay with that setup out of inertia (and the fact that we can't connect to he.net in San Diego).

A similar setup exists for us in Zurich with init7.

However, you are correct and we need to edit that FAQ language: our geo-redundant site in Fremont does not work that way.

(I will note that it has been 11 years since we put that location in place (he.net in Fremont) and it has zero minutes of downtime)

A tremendous amount of complexity and attack surface are eschewed by living with that setup and we're always looking for new ways to make that tradeoff.

[1] Castle Acess datacenter on Aero drive. Is now a KIO managed datacenter.

Re: Interview with CEO of rsync.net: “no firewalls and no routers”

#166
post #164

I wish I had a personal use case where the pricing of rsync.net made sense. It looks like a great service. For now, I use Backblaze Unlimited. I realize they are not the same service, but Backblaze works for my personal stuff and the price is great.

I like backblaze, dont get me wrong, but my issue with them was their software is Windows Client and Mac OS only... No Linux or Windows Server offerings... My desktop runs either Windows Server 2019 or Linux... I havent run a desktop class verison of Windows on a phsyical workstation in years... As an aside, i use RSync and their Borg Backup option[1] for backing up my Linux box, and Windows is backed up to that Linux box too... works well... Borg can be gotten to work with B2[2], but its a bit more messing...

[1]:https://www.rsync.net/products/borg.html [2]:https://medium.com/@mormesher/building-your-own-linux-cloud-...

Re: Interview with CEO of rsync.net: “no firewalls and no routers”

#167
post #35
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've used rsync.net in the past- it's essentially "filesystem as a service." You, the customer, use it to back your own software that handles the encryption and replication. Their website has some how-to guides for some common software, or you can roll your own with the rsync protocol. Notably, their website only claims transfer encryption, not encryption at rest. You can of course encrypt your files yourself with yo…

Not having data encrypted by default is concerning, however I do admire the simplistic approach of handling your own dataflow and tools for sure.

If it's such a concern, why wouldn't you be sending them encrypted in the first place?

Re: Interview with CEO of rsync.net: “no firewalls and no routers”

#168
post #159

Meta: I really dislike the style of console.dev, the article is shunted to the left and leaves the rest of the screen real estate to be taken up by an - albeit pretty - but unnecessary piece of digital artwork. This - https://ibb.co/nzbFxjW - is what the article looks like on my ultrawide which made for very uncomfortable viewing

What would you prefer? Having an entire paragraph of text on a single line? Your monitor is the wrong shape.

Re: Interview with CEO of rsync.net: “no firewalls and no routers”

#170
post #164

I wish I had a personal use case where the pricing of rsync.net made sense. It looks like a great service. For now, I use Backblaze Unlimited. I realize they are not the same service, but Backblaze works for my personal stuff and the price is great.

> Backblaze

Test your backups.

https://messengergeek.wordpress.com/2018/03/09/backblaze-rev...

Post reply on HN