Live data from Hacker News

Cameras and secret trackers reveal where Amazon returns end up

cbc.ca

161–170 of 351 posts

Re: Cameras and secret trackers reveal where Amazon returns end up

#161
post #21

> Fulfillment by Amazon Donations, which Amazon says will help sellers send returns directly to charities instead of disposing of them. So the seller ends up having to take the loss?

Well, everyone who buys from the seller splits the loss. No doubt it's built into their prices.

Re: Cameras and secret trackers reveal where Amazon returns end up

#162
post #91

It's insane to me that ONE of their returns traveled 105 miles around the city of Toronto alone.

It is unintuitive that an overnight package sent from Mississauga to Milton would go to Atlanta first, but that is the key insight Fred Smith had when he created FedEx. Regarding the CBC returns featured in the video, the 105 mile detour and the denim coveralls going to an electronics recycling facility support FedEx's strategy: exceptions in the normal processing workflow are error prone and expensive relative to the extra transportation costs.

The assumptions underlying the criticism of Amazon's and FedEx's strategy is that landfill costs and/or transportation costs do not represent the true cost to society.

Re: Cameras and secret trackers reveal where Amazon returns end up

#163
post #23
post #3

> 30 to 40 per cent of all online purchases are sent back That seems almost an order of magnitude higher than I’d expect. Setting aside kids shoes (which probably do get 50% returned), I can’t imagine sending back even 5% of my online purchases, let alone 30-40%. I think I’ve sent back exactly 1 Amazon order in the last year, out of nearly 100.

I have friends who send back nearly everything. Not sure about shoe size? Order 3 sizes, keep the one you like and send back the other two (or return all 3 if you dont like it). Want a shirt? Order 5 and keep the ones you like, if any.

That's how every woman in my life, ever, has shopped for apparel, from TJ Maxx to Saks to Amazon.

I always felt bad about returns, but my SO worked retail in school and assured me this is how it's designed to be and how every big shopper does it.

And I don't blame returners. There used to be a website that listed variance in sizes from major clothing brands and fashion lines, and it can be huge. If I like a cut of jeans or slacks, I have to try on several, and they without fail will not fit the same.

Re: Cameras and secret trackers reveal where Amazon returns end up

#164
When I called them last week, they offered to repair a faulty hard drive (clicking noises, SMART errors through the roof) ...

If they try to repair an irreparable hard drive but throw perfectly good items like a bag they're quite dysfunctional.

And their inability to send all the ordered items in ONE package is irritating too.

Re: Cameras and secret trackers reveal where Amazon returns end up

#165
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it depends a lot on category. What you said about kids clothing is spot on, but I'd expect similar dynamics for women's clothing (tighter fits = lower tolerance, also lower tolerance for color mismatch etc) and there are a couple of categories that I've outright stopped buying on Amazon because of the enormous problem rate, namely whitelabeled consumer electronics. In 2020 I've returned ~5%: markers that were…

I've also stopped buying at Amazon after 15 years. Even consumables and small items are problematic. Just in the last year, I encountered many issues including: * Showerhead that came without box, and clearly used. It still had a lot of water inside! * Underwear from a brand that sells items inside a sealed bag and discards returns came used, without bag (yuck!) * A module of Samsung RAM had visible wear signs and di…

I won't be buying anything expensive from Amazon anymore. I ordered a 2TB nvme SSD which came in a padded envelope. I didn't even try it before returning it. Its own packing was a simple blister pack. $250

I ordered a camera lens which also came in a padded envelope. $400.

I got a box of wet wipes from them. It had its own sturdy box and they were placed in another box lined with shipping paper. $12.

I also won't buy anything that goes into my body. I ordered toothpaste and it came from some guy's basement. He wrapped them in plastic wrap and wrote two pack on the outside.

Amazon gets lazier and lazier by the day and is in a lot of ways no better than a flea market.

Re: Cameras and secret trackers reveal where Amazon returns end up

#166
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm sure there are people who abuse the system, but for you example of clothes, I'm not surprised there is a high number of returns. Last year I bought two Levis jeans at the same time. One the exact same model, color and size as the one I was wearing which was worn out, the other a different color (figured I could use having two pairs of jeans). None fit me correctly. The model I had already was too big, the other t…

Levis in particular are just notoriously inconsistent in sizing. At a brick and mortar store you grab five pairs to try on if you want to buy one or two.

For mens sizes I find that very odd, as the size are defined units of measurement, unlike the headache that is womens sizes.

Re: Cameras and secret trackers reveal where Amazon returns end up

#167
post #146
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

jeff@amazon.com

goes straight to /dev/null

Unless it has changed, I received a response from some executive team and my request was granted (I missed a substantial Kindle sale by a day, and asked if they would still honor the price).

Re: Cameras and secret trackers reveal where Amazon returns end up

#168
post #3

> 30 to 40 per cent of all online purchases are sent back That seems almost an order of magnitude higher than I’d expect. Setting aside kids shoes (which probably do get 50% returned), I can’t imagine sending back even 5% of my online purchases, let alone 30-40%. I think I’ve sent back exactly 1 Amazon order in the last year, out of nearly 100.

It's important to note "sent back" doesn't imply "because it was defective".

People who pay for Prime do it specifically because it facilitates the way they shop. They buy a lot of stuff, figure out what they want, like, and need, and send the rest back.

It's completely normal, expected behavior in retail apparently.

Re: Cameras and secret trackers reveal where Amazon returns end up

#169
post #136

In Germany there are companies that buy up returns by the kilogram (mostly clothes), sometimes the e-commerce companies even pay them to take the goods off their backs. They then ship them to countries like Irak, Serbia or Lebanon to prevent those perfectly goood items to "flood" the European market. That way especially clothing brands protect their inflated prices.

So, then, why aren’t there companies doing the reverse: buying up the bulk clothing return boxes, not shipping them out of the country, but instead retailing them locally (and, indeed, “flooding” the domestic market in the process)? Seems like exactly the sort of competitive strategy I’d expect from the “off-price” stores (TJ Maxx in the US, Winner’s in Canada, etc.).

I would assume it’s an issue of agreements with Amazon.

Re: Cameras and secret trackers reveal where Amazon returns end up

#170
post #3

> 30 to 40 per cent of all online purchases are sent back That seems almost an order of magnitude higher than I’d expect. Setting aside kids shoes (which probably do get 50% returned), I can’t imagine sending back even 5% of my online purchases, let alone 30-40%. I think I’ve sent back exactly 1 Amazon order in the last year, out of nearly 100.

QVC has an incredible return policy and their margins are built around it.

I do think that anything they cannot process properly should be handed off to charity groups who would get items in exchange for helping sort it all out. Then again, having seen my local St Vincents and Goodwill they to suffer overflow but at least with Amazon returns the items would be newer

Post reply on HN