Earlier quoted context omitted.
> price-subsidies on non-sugary foods. That makes a big assumption that people aren't buying more spinach because of price of spinach. beans and rice are already super cheap. Much healthier and cheaper option than mcdonalds.
> beans and rice are already super cheap. Much healthier and cheaper option than mcdonalds. Why are you slyly shifting from "sugar" to "mcdonalds"? Minus drinks and desserts, McDonalds' offerings are not high in sugar. > That makes a big assumption that people aren't buying more spinach because of price of spinach. The price per calorie of spinach is extremely high. Micronutrients are great and all, but you can't liv…
Aren't carbohydrates sugar though?
Why is the distinction between sugar in drinks and sugar is burger buns relevant to the discussion.
> Micronutrients are great and all, but you can't live off micronutrients alone.
Why did you slyly ignore 'beans and rice' in my comment. I wasn't suggesting people get their calories from spinach, what a weird interpretation.
my mexican family of 5 ate this combo every single day ,growing up. spinach + rice+ beans and occasional meat was afforable on one gardner's salary.