Live data from Hacker News

TikTok: Cheerfulness and censorship

netzpolitik.org

161–162 of 162 posts

Re: TikTok: Cheerfulness and censorship

#161
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please don't take the thread further into nationalistic flamewar. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

My comment is on andrepd's meta topic of: “I don't like that HNers tend to focus on negative or critical things about China, Russia, or Africa when these topics arise.”. My comment is "new" in that, in this thread, what I've said was not yet said in response to this specific complaint. My comment is related to the thread, and not generic (it mentions the characters introduced by the parent thread [China, Africa, crit…

I'm sorry I wasn't able to respond to this in depth. I hear the questions. There just isn't always time to give an in-depth response everywhere. You're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com, as long as you don't mind unpredictable response latencies.

Re: TikTok: Cheerfulness and censorship

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Alex Jones, for example, has been removed from YouTube and Facebook.

He's still the top result on Google. The parent comment is suggesting that there are topics that there are topics wich would get him banned just for mentioning them.

People have been punished here for answering a very similar question to yours (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19945640). Even mentioning Alex Jones is very risky. And depending on the answer to your question might actually get you sued, at least in europe.

It's become impossible to say things you're legally allowed to anywhere but very fringe places on the web. [inb4 "private company etc etc": Sites can police speech as they want. Still it's a shame.]

Post reply on HN