The police posting photos of his new house is disingenuous and irrelevant and has nothing to do with the fact that morally they should compensate him for the destroyed previous house at fair market value. That the law apparently does not require them to do so only means the law is without meaning and deserves only contempt from any rational ethical person.
Police Owe Nothing to Man Whose Home They Blew Up, Appeals Court Says
161–163 of 163 posts
Him having build a nicer house has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with his reasonably asking compensation for the insane amount of damage police irresponsibly did to his house (using military weapons to blowing multiple giant holes in the side of it, rendering it uninhabitable) in the pursuit of some idiot that stole a chinese made tee-shirt worth at most $7.
Re: Police Owe Nothing to Man Whose Home They Blew Up, Appeals Court Says
#162Re: Police Owe Nothing to Man Whose Home They Blew Up, Appeals Court Says
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
The police aren't interested in investigating low-value cases. However, with a suspect in sight they'll go after them even if it's low-value.
Then why don't they investigate wage theft? Googling around suggests that the cost to the US economy is about the same as shoplifting (and I'm guessing individual cases could be much higher value than shoplifting). When was the last time a battering ram was used in pursuit of a wage thief? Or when was one even arrested? To answer my own questions, police do not care so much about the "value" of the target. Their beha…
How much wage theft is treated as a criminal matter vs a civil matter?
Furthermore, cops aren't exactly skilled at digging out such things. Wage theft is something for the department of labor, not the cops.