Live data from Hacker News

Candidates for Mozilla's IRC Successor

exple.tive.org

161–170 of 219 posts

Re: Candidates for Mozilla's IRC Successor

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm guessing they are talking about this issue which has been open for a disturbingly long time: https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/issues/955

It seems to be grinding through to a conclusion. Google analytics has already been removed (2018).

Activity only started after the ICO made contact with them as a result of my complaint.

(I also have issues with how slow the ICO are at investigating, but that's a different story)

Re: Candidates for Mozilla's IRC Successor

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can have both notifications and a persistent history with the majority of IRC clients. Many public channels keep logs, even. If someone pings me (hilight), then I get an urgency hint. Most window managers handle urgency hints. I use openbox + xterm + irssi. I do get notified if someone pings me, and I can also add any arbitrary words for which I would get notified. With a small Perl script I could use notify-send…

Persistent history including things that happened when you weren't connected . Obviously logging is easy, this isn't about client logs. With phone notifications, you not only need to work for things that happened while not connected, it's bad form to require a permanent connection on android and you can't do it at all on an iphone.

We have https://thelounge.chat/ running.

I don't miss anything.

Re: Candidates for Mozilla's IRC Successor

#163
post #50
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No persistent presence, no true source-of-truth logging, bad authentiation - I mean, there's really nothing good about IRC unless you have a fetish for late '90s tech.

Everything you dislike about IRC is precisely what I like.

There are still old country bumpkin types with rotary phones..

Re: Candidates for Mozilla's IRC Successor

#164
post #159
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am hoping they go with Matrix, least then I will be able to have the choice of having a client appropriate to my needs. I do prefer my chat client to not be a part of my browser. That way I can close my browser, start my browser and chat client on login ie from i3/sway etc. A tab in a browser runs the risk of getting closed. I love using weechat (weechat.org) and have used it for decades. The Matrix plugin for Weec…

You really don't want Matrix. One year of Matrix to IRC bridge cost me about 30GB in Postgresql database to hold the state/logs of everything. It was less than 500MB of plaintext irssi logs.

Did you figure out what's with the 60x bloat? Badly denormalized and storing tons of metadata? Storing images/video?

Re: Candidates for Mozilla's IRC Successor

#165
post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They can make it a reality by backing the Matrix.org protocol, or even Ruma, the Rust implementation.

Interesting. Any good resources on Matrix? How has adoption been going until now?

France and KDE are probably the two most well known adopters rn last time I heard. https://matrix.org explains the protocol, and if you join the MatrixHQ room (#matrix:matrix.org) you can ask all you want, lots of people around to answer, and even Matthew (project lead) is often on there too.

Re: Candidates for Mozilla's IRC Successor

#166

I've read somewhere that matrix server uses too much RAM due to bad design. Personally I'd prefer XMPP.

The current reference implementation, Synapse (Python) seems to take up around 2GB of RAM, Dendrite (Golang) rn uses up to 100MB according to Matthew (project lead). Note that Dendrite is still a WIP. Currently I don't think anyone is too sure about how Ruma (Rust) would perform as it is still very early in development.

Re: Candidates for Mozilla's IRC Successor

#167

Really excited to see Discord rejected. Watching Discord take over open source and free culture communities has been disheartening to say the least.

I think people are moving to discord as a stop-gap because they place user experience above everything else.

There's a lot of alternatives, but until they provide a good user experience, I don't see a point in purposefully making peoples' lives suck.

I'm confident that alternative's to discord will get better with time, but they're really not there yet.

Re: Candidates for Mozilla's IRC Successor

#168
post #94

I'm sad to see Zulip excluded from the list. It solves the #1 issue with large group chats - proper threading. Nothing worse than waking up to a 1000 message backlog you have to sort through to filter out the information relevant to you. Except for Slack, all of their other choices have very poor threading. They said they had trouble to get it working behind IAM, but Zulip is just a Django application. Surely there's…

It's $7 per user per month unless you are a favored open source project that they want to bless.

Unless I'm reading the pricing info[1] incorrectly, it seems like the free plan wouldn't be even close to being usable for a project of more than 2 people...

[1]: https://zulipchat.com/plans/

Re: Candidates for Mozilla's IRC Successor

#169
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Die? No, but it is slowly degrading. More and more the people in my old freenode chatrooms are idle or simply leaving. We've gotten so used to phone notifications and a persistent history, that IRC has fallen behind purely from a convenience factor. It's rock solid in what it does, I have zero doubt about that or your 15 year claim. But even if the protocol works, if the user base isn't being added to it will die eve…

> We've gotten so used to phone notifications and a persistent history, that IRC has fallen behind purely from a convenience factor. I have that with a bouncer (znc) and a plugin. I've not used it, but it is my understanding that IRCCloud does this too. Problem is that there aren't many easily usable options for this apart from IRCCloud and even IRCCloud itself isn't all that well marketed. Always seemed kind of weir…

I think free (spyvertising supported) and free or steeply discounted (operating at a VC-backed loss) commercial offerings both being so common dampens enthusiasm to work on and demand for open source software, especially the user-facing stuff. Earlier on in computing history (into the mid '00s, at least) such things were much less common.

I think it also dampens the same for traditional paid software in a lot of areas, incidentally.

Re: Candidates for Mozilla's IRC Successor

#170
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've never heard of this but I'm not particularly in the field... Can you expand?

Rust is moving from irc to discord as a result of mozilla sunsetting their irc server. I know one datapoint is not a trend, but it's a high profile datapoint.

fwiw, the Embedded Rust Working Group moved to matrix: https://rust-embedded.github.io/blog/newsletter-18/
Post reply on HN