Earlier quoted context omitted.
I took a look at the list for Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting and asked myself, how many of those journalists broke the law? The 2019 winner reported on a University of Southern California gynecologist accused of violating hundreds of young women. In order to write the story they went to former USC employees and solicited, among other things, patient confidential information. This is of course a crime by b…
In order to write the story they went to former USC employees and solicited, among other things, patient confidential information. What you have written is libel, and I suggest you remove your comment, since the LA Times has stated exactly how they conducted the investigation. Ryan, Hamilton and a third colleague, Paul Pringle, kept knocking on doors, and over a period of months, they persuaded more than 20 current a…
"This story is based on interviews with more than 20 current and former USC employees. Most spoke on the condition of anonymity, citing patient confidentiality laws"
Odd behavior citing patient confidentiality laws if the former USC employees does not think they divulged any information that is covered by patient confidentiality.