I'm a huge fan of Looker, but I'm not sure how I feel about this news. The best parts of Looker: - It connects directly to your existing data warehouse. Most BI tools suck in your data into their datastore; Looker queries your database directly. If you wanted Looker to cache results for performance reasons, you could set up a dedicated schema in Redshift for example and only give write privileges to that one schema.…
Oh, I can tell you what is going to happen. It is going to be killed in about 2-3 years.
Google to Acquire Looker
161–170 of 175 posts
Re: Google to Acquire Looker
#162http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=H...
Re: Google to Acquire Looker
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Basically Tableau You mean Mode/Periscope/Superset/Metabase. I don't see anything that put's Kato near Tableau's offerings like Server, Prep etc.
what makes Mode/Periscope/Superset/Metabase the same category to you? Is it that they have SQL editing as a main entrypoint?
In Kato filters can be replaced anywhere. Plus we offer a ton of integration and data manipulation features. One of the biggest things that the client really liked over Superset is the ability to set up drilldowns where when you click on a bar chart on any graph you can see further details about that bar chart in a table, or any other graph. And this drilldown can go however many levels deep. We can link different reports from entirely different datasources with drilldown. I don't think that's available in any of those mentioned above and it completely changes the user experience.
Re: Google to Acquire Looker
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
Android?
android is great /s https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/06/googl...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/gordonkelly/2019/01/29/apple-io...
Re: Google to Acquire Looker
#165I'm curious to see how Google handle acquiring a company which requires some fairly high touch sales. Looker is a fantastic tool, but its not something which is useful from day one, and at least currently has a high enough price tag attached to it that they involve a lot of sales engineering in getting new customers to a point where they're able to query data they care about.
I would interpret this as a sign that Thomas Kurian is trying to "enterprisify" Google Cloud by acquiring companies with high-touch enterprise sales cultures. Which runs against Google's traditional stance but is also credited as one of the reason Google Cloud has struggled to sell into big companies so far.
For instance, this is the mantra about Borg, Omega, Kubernetes and GKE, or Blaze and Bazel, or etc.: well, we have an amazing thing, we copied a bit of it for you because you’re not us, but isn’t it great? Please send any feedback to our noreply@google.com autoresponder so we never have to leave the hive.
TBC, the world is better for the stuff Google externalized! CNCF wouldn’t be what it is otherwise. But the default attitude about it is the exact opposite of how enterprises get comfort in buying.
Re: Google to Acquire Looker
#166I'm a huge fan of Looker, but I'm not sure how I feel about this news. The best parts of Looker: - It connects directly to your existing data warehouse. Most BI tools suck in your data into their datastore; Looker queries your database directly. If you wanted Looker to cache results for performance reasons, you could set up a dedicated schema in Redshift for example and only give write privileges to that one schema.…
As a looker customer seeing this news makes me very uneasy. We have invested a ton in their platform by building three of our core products on their embedded version. The thought that our future relies now more in Google's product decisions is scary.
Re: Google to Acquire Looker
#167Looker is one of the best upcoming BI platforms in the market. I like Looker. I even took Looker Certificate exam 3 years ago because I think Looker consultant will be valuable in the future. I would’ve already joined Looker to get their shares if they have office in Vancouver. :slightly_smiling_face:
LookML is a killer feature that solves a critical pain point in Enterprise BI and set Looker apart from the competitors, like Tableau and Periscope. This feature is no value to small startups and small company, but great feature for mid-size company, and critical to Large enterprise BI. Looker has a great potential to become the next leading Large Enterprise BI that successes Oracle OBIEE, MS PowerBI and SAP Business Object.
I think if Google is to take Looker and make it the next Enterprise BI and use it to get in the door of large Enterprise Customers, They are making a right strategy move. Google will bring a superior BI solution to its top-tier enterprise customers than IBM, Oracle, SAP. It plays well with Google’s strength in data offering, and BI the easier segment for Google to break through comparing to ERP, CRM and other enterprise solution segments.
If Google just wants part of Looker and absorb into the Google Machine, they are paying too high a price tag for it. (I don’t think that’s what Google are doing). I don’t think Google is buying it to eliminate competitor either, Google doesn’t have any products that offer similar features or target same market as Looker
Re: Google to Acquire Looker
#168Frankly, this one patent is worth a lot of money. This is the magic by which Looker casts out duplicate records in joins. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=H...
Re: Google to Acquire Looker
#169Me and My team have been working on a Looker alternative for a couple of years. Hope this is the right time to give a pitch. We as a company love to assist our clients with a free consultation in understanding their data better. This will take you to the direct demo: https://demo.katoai.co/login?email=demo@katoai.co&password=k... I can talk a lot about it if anyone is interested.
What is the target market? Can small business use this? Looks pretty cool!
Re: Google to Acquire Looker
#170Hey all, as a potential competitor of Looker, I'm not sure how I should feel about this news. :) Here are some of the facts: 1. When Google acquired Alooma, they slowed down the development and dropped the support for other destinations such as Redshift and Hive. Even though Alooma is a data pipeline tool which makes it similar to Looker's case, the deal was $150M (compared to $2.6B) so I'm not sure the comparison ma…
Don't worry about it. It's undoubtedly an aquihire. If there is one thing that Google demonstrates consistently is a complete disregard for relationships with external parties. This product will die once Google stops communicating with external companies. This is your opportunity to reassure your partners you're not going away and to reach out to Looker's companies to see if you can help stay in-front of this. Just d…