Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thats purely corruption. I always explain to my argentinian friends, used to the petty corruption of putting friends and family in public positions, that the us does corruption at a much bigger scale: at the legal one. The transbay terminal is one of the biggest rip-offs ever. It cost the revenue of sales taxes of the city for years. And it doesn't even work, while the "transient" station that must have cost almost n…
Sorry that temporary one worked like ass. Rainy and wet, cold, hard to navigate around, just a big parking lot and some tents.
Why American Construction Costs Are So High
161–164 of 164 posts
Re: Why American Construction Costs Are So High
#162Meanwhile in Brazil, China and India curiosity reigns.
Re: Why American Construction Costs Are So High
#163> In Paris, as well as Athens, Madrid, Mexico City, Caracas, Santiago, Copenhagen, Budapest, and I imagine other cities for which I can’t find this information, metro stations are built cut-and-cover... There is extensive street disruption, for about 18 months in the case of Paris, but the merchants and residents get a subway station at the end of the works. The cost of using a more expensive method ($750M per statio…
I'm actually curious: how do those businesses, particularly smaller ones, survive 18 months of highly impeded traffic?
Re: Why American Construction Costs Are So High
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want to put the Panama Canal through Boston it's going to cost astronomically more than $24bn — the logistics (not to mention the requirements and processes of the time period) are entirely different.
How is that at all relevant?
This parent poster is pointing out the fallacy by hypothesizing that the Panama canal in Boston would be way more expensive than the Panama canal in Panama, thereby showing the error in the grandparent post's reasoning.