Live data from Hacker News

Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers

blog.google

161–170 of 733 posts

Re: Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even now, I can't figure out how to send someone a friend request. All I see is a Subscribe button when I visit someone's profile.

I just spent 20 mins searching for this and on the Android app at least I can't figure it out either!

never used it myself, but its the third icon on the top-right corner (its a speech bubble with an arrow on it)

after that you can click on [friends] and youll get a [friend me] url

Re: Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers

#162
post #49

LOL, one more example of why one should never depend on anything from Google. developer adoption Gee, I wonder why? Maybe because they never released a usable write API and were basically just a little less developer-hostile than Twitter? G+ had a lot of potential, had Google chosen to truly embrace Open Standards, federation, and usable API's. As it is, they shot themselves in the foot by creating JAWG (Just Another…

> never depend on anything from Google They're shutting it down precisely because no one was depending on it. How would anyone depend on a social network without any users?

No. We use a small part of the people API in production and will have to make changes in our code to avoid breakage. IIRC various points in Google's documentation pointed us to the more modern people API for our desired use case, away from "older" APIs which we will now have to revert back to...

Re: Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers

#164
A Google+ private community allows social, collaborative photo sharing photos with friends with login required. This is not supported in Google Photos! With Photos shared albums you can select people with whom to share, but those people just get an email with a secret token embedded in a URL -- aside from trusting your non-technical friends not to accidentally leak this URL, there is no way to know who is viewing the photos or remove access from specific individuals. I really hope the Photos team upgrades their shared album permission model now that the alternative in Google+ has been sunsetted.

Re: Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean you really can't argue that Google's attempts to move away from relying on ad revenue for most of its earnings have been successful

Yes but not following how that relates to "poorly managed"? I mean they are in all of history the fastest to a $100B market cap and since started in 1998 it was right at the .com bust. Then the fastest to $200B. Does that not take good management?

Managing not to screw up their de facto monopoly on search/ad placement is not the same as managing to do something else highly profitably

Re: Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers

#166
I used G+ a lot a few years back, and I did dozens of posts of logs of projects and so on... and then one day I wanted to refer to one of them to someone and discovered you can't search you own posts.

That immediately stopped me posted anything. It's almost write-once, read never sort of medium. It's too bad, there were a few good ideas and so on, and I had a bit of traction of a few good 'circles' but I'm pretty sure that like me, everyone else stopped.

Now, I have to figure out a way of re-importing all that content to something else, probably homebrewed this time.

IN FACT I've just checked, and G+ seems to have forgotten every single post I've made, but one. https://plus.google.com/+MichelPollet

EDIT: Now the posts are back. I must have been archived on CDs or something ;-)

Re: Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers

#167
IMHO Google+ failed for one reason. At least it's the reason it failed for me. There was no way to post something on someone else's feed. When I used Facebook, this may have been the #1 thing that I used it for (and events).

If I saw something I thought a friend would enjoy or made me think of them, I'd post it on their wall. This is drastically different than sending a message or e-mailing in that my friend's friends will also see it.

In Google+ (at least when I tried it), there was no way to perform this action. So I never used it again.

Re: Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers

#168
post #99

This is Vic Gundotra's legacy and perhaps the first major strategic decision Larry Page made in the post-Eric Schmidt era and it was the design and launch of Google+ and (IMHO) it marked a turning point in the company's culture. Internal resistance to aspects of G+ was enormous. People outside the company get this idea that Google acts as some kind of singleminded (possibly nefarious) entity when "herding cats" is so…

Not relevant, but "the fish rots from the head" is relevant to Chinese? I cannot find any explanation of that connection. Just curious.

Re: Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Erm, Facebook did implement something like this. Shortly after Google+ came out. You can still assign friends to different groups.

Alas, the concept was never fleshed out and is all but buried and featureless.

Nope. They're shutting it down https://techcrunch.com/2018/08/09/facebook-is-shutting-down-...

Re: Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers

#170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Alas, the concept was never fleshed out and is all but buried and featureless.

It's not heavily promoted but it is there. You can view feeds of your Facebook friend lists, just like Google+. Bookmark those feeds and you are good to go.

They're shutting that feature down: https://techcrunch.com/2018/08/09/facebook-is-shutting-down-...
Post reply on HN