Live data from Hacker News

Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

kvonhorn.github.io

161–170 of 231 posts

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

References can say whatever they want.

References can be (and have been) sure for giving a review that keeps a person from getting a job. If I’m in a position where I can’t give a good reference, I don’t give a reference at all.

Which is probably a good policy for a lot of other reasons.

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#162
Since I'm looking for a job these days I saw a recruiter post a story on LinkedIn. The story was about this TERRIBLE TREND of some workers "ghosting" recruiters. They describe a process where a recruiter talks to a prospective employee, the prospective employee might even interview with the company. ... and then the prospective employee stops responding to emails, phone calls, any messages.

It was theorized that these darned menials just don't know how to behave.

I couldn't help but think that the whole article was some sort of recruiter trolling thing because outside of jobs that I've gotten in the past ... every recruiter has ghosted me. Amusing that they'd complain about it themselves.

Talking to or working with recruiters is just a constant pain. They don't know anything about the actual technical side of my job (those that say they do know even less it seems) and I have to do this dance with them to fit their expectations and such.

Can I please talk to the technical guy now? It will take us maybe 5 min to know if we should keep talking or not...

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#163
post #160
post #95

I got a call from an external recruiter: "I have a candidate who would be a great fit for your company." I'm just a lowly data scientist with no hiring power, and at that job the entire data science team was quitting. So, I mentioned that I didn't think the team was growing since it seemed to be actively shrinking with no new reqs that I was aware of. Recruiter immediately turned it around and said they could represe…

> Nope nope nope nope nope. I'm not giving you a resume that you can modify however you see fit, only to cold call and cold email it around to random people you find on linkedin. But... that's exactly the services a recruiter provides. Someone needs to make those calls if you want a new job, unless you feel that you're such a catch that you can rely exclusively on networking with former coworkers to find you new posi…

> rely exclusively on networking with former coworkers to find you new positions

Maybe not exclusively, but having a strong network is one of (if not the) best ways to stay gainfully employed. The best jobs I’ve had were found through former coworkers, friends from conferences, or folks I’ve corresponded with on technical issues. Knowing and being respected by someone internal to a company typically bypasses the first two or three interview steps, insulates you from petty interviewers to a large degree, and overall greases the hiring wheels. Keeping in touch with former coworkers and cultivating friendships through conferences pays off tremendously!

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#164
I give a lot of references and as far as I can tell, the norm is for offers to be contingent on references; that is: references don't gate offers.

I think it's reasonable, and would personally recommend, that you demand at least a verbal agreement that an offer is forthcoming before offering a reference.

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#165
Why do people use recruiters? %99 percent of the time you can figure out who the company is they are representing. Often recruiter sites will even list the companies they represent. EVERY startup I have worked for that does hiring, hates paying the %20+ markup for a hire. We would much rather give that cash to the new employee and use it to be more competitive. If there are two candidates with equal skill sets, one is $130k (recruiter (20k) + their salary (110k) ) and the other is $110 (just their salary) -- often management will lean towards the guy for 110k in a strapped for cash startup. They view you as a $130k a year employee NOT a 110k a year employee.

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#166

Why do people use recruiters? %99 percent of the time you can figure out who the company is they are representing. Often recruiter sites will even list the companies they represent. EVERY startup I have worked for that does hiring, hates paying the %20+ markup for a hire. We would much rather give that cash to the new employee and use it to be more competitive. If there are two candidates with equal skill sets, one i…

Competent recruiters with good reputations and connections are like gold - especially in markets that aren't "Software Developer in Coastal USA". They know the state of the market, the main players, who is looking, who is good to work for, what the pay is going to be and whether applying is worth your time. They understand the value of establishing relationships with good people and will work to ensure a good fit for all involved, because the only thing better than a $20k bonus for getting someone into a job is getting a $30k bonus a couple years later by doing barely any work because both sides of the deal came to you.

This is almost exactly like the difference between good, high value sales, and telemarketing. One is a relationships game, one is a commodified numbers game. Don't be a commodity, and you won't be treated like one.

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#168
post #148
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

... is there Yelp for recruiters? Because I'd want to know a recruiter pulls stunts like that before I work with them.

Have you ever seen Yelp reviews for car salespeople? Recruiters are the used car salespeople of the hiring world. There’s no point in a review system where everyone averages out to 0 stars.

Strongly disagree. I hope you are being hyperbolic. While there is certainly a wide range in competency and the level of value provided by recruiters, many of them are MUCH better than zero stars.

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#169
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

... is there Yelp for recruiters? Because I'd want to know a recruiter pulls stunts like that before I work with them.

I don't think this would work. Anyone that is already using shady business practices wouldn't object to posting a few fake reviews of themselves and their competitors either.

People will post fake reviews but I don't think that means this necessarily wouldn't work. It would certainly be challenging though.

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#170

I got an email from a local recruiter a few weeks ago and stepped outside during my lunch break to give her a call. On the initial phone call she asked me where I worked currently. After the call I stepped back into my work where I sit back to back with my manager. No more than 5 minutes later his phone rings, its the recruiter calling to see if they have any need of her services. I emailed her while he was on the ph…

I've been told this is illegal as the recruiter is harming your prospects at your current job...

What law is that?
Post reply on HN