Live data from Hacker News

Email exchange between MIT Media Lab and the IOTA Foundation [pdf]

tangleblog.com

161–162 of 162 posts

Re: Email exchange between MIT Media Lab and the IOTA Foundation [pdf]

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's wrong with Magic Leap? Just curious, I've never heard anything negative.

Sorry about the slow reply, it’s a very reasonable question you’re asking. http://www.kguttag.com Let your fingers do the walking.

Thank you :)

Re: Email exchange between MIT Media Lab and the IOTA Foundation [pdf]

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, it's complete bullocks. Rest assured, if anything was better than binary for _logic_ then it would already have taken over the world. Binary have a lot of wonderful properties (not least noise immunity) and deserves a lot of credit for the success of modern technology. Note, the ENIAC wasn't binary! It was based on decimal. However there are places where we look beyond binary; most notably in storage where data…

It is not "complete bollocks",it just not as efficient as it appears to be. The reason for the (supposedly) higher efficiency of ternary logic is so called Radix Economy (wikipedia has an article). Properly implemented ternary (with a split power supply - positive, negative and ground) would have the same noise immunity as binary.

> Properly implemented ternary (with a split power supply - positive, negative and ground) would have the same noise immunity as binary.

Only if you increase the supply voltage such that: V+tern - GNDtern == V+bin - GNDbin == GNDtern - V-tern

Post reply on HN