Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, I don't think that's correct. A security doesn't have its own value independently of the payment stream it represents, any more than the deed to a house has its own value independently of the house. But the same payment stream (or house) might be of different value to different people, so buying or selling it can create wealth.
So the risk and form that the payment stream takes (ie. bond coupons are different from rental property income) might both be $100 for example, but if someone is overindexed in real estate in their portfolio, there may be more value to them in the bond?
Three Delusions: Paper Wealth, a Booming Economy, and Bitcoin
161–163 of 163 posts
Re: Three Delusions: Paper Wealth, a Booming Economy, and Bitcoin
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seeing as the market always recovers and then some, you are going to need to make very, very good returns in the downturns to make up for all the list potential on the upside. In other words, the overall return of the markets over their entire lifetime is positive, not negative. It would be great to ride the bull and then switch to the bear in a down market. But that would require timing the market.
The market always recovers? Japan must not have gotten the memo. Or is the U.S. too special to ever have the same problems as Japan?
Re: Three Delusions: Paper Wealth, a Booming Economy, and Bitcoin
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
What are you talking about? The protocol is standardized, there are 3 implementations in testing, they're sending multi-hop transactions across all 3 different implementations on the Bitcoin mainnest, there's at least one client plus an explorer. https://news.bitcoin.com/lightning-networks-new-infrastructu... It's clearly on track for a 2018 release.
"On track for a 2018 release" is not a timeline, IMO. Elizabeth Stark said we were https://twitter.com/starkness/status/676599570898419712 And for the downvoters: I am no shill. I've been holding BTC long-term. I am just a realist with a good understanding of the reliability of software engineers' estimates, esp. in this case.