Live data from Hacker News

Google collects cell tower info even if location services are disabled

qz.com

161–170 of 422 posts

Re: Google collects cell tower info even if location services are disabled

#161
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In India, it’s about $309 today. So about three times the average monthly wage if the numbers I find are right. (Sneak edit) Just to write it down another way, that means 25% of the average yearly income. For a phone.

So, get one second hand and it will be even cheaper. The point was it is not $700 for security.

Ever tried using an old iPhone?

Re: Google collects cell tower info even if location services are disabled

#162
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In India, it’s about $309 today. So about three times the average monthly wage if the numbers I find are right. (Sneak edit) Just to write it down another way, that means 25% of the average yearly income. For a phone.

So, get one second hand and it will be even cheaper. The point was it is not $700 for security.

The point isn't that it's $700, rather that it's (at least) a month's salary, even used, for someone in a more developing country.

Re: Google collects cell tower info even if location services are disabled

#163
post #63

It's amazing to me how many comments here excuse Google's behavior by offering the impractical "solution" of just not using a smartphone (a false dilemma) when the obvious answer is to get an iPhone. That's the advice of pretty much everyone in the infosec field and I'm sure some of them will attest to that in this thread.

How many commenters do you think make their money in the tech industry?

Always follow the money.

Re: Google collects cell tower info even if location services are disabled

#164
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> impractical "solution" of just not using a smartphone (a false dilemma) when the obvious answer is to get an iPhone. What is your life like to where you think not having a cell is impractical. In any case a smart phone is fundamentally a weak point in privacy/security no matter which one you get.

> What is your life like to where you think not having a cell is impractical. In the 90s it was inconvenient to be out and about if you were expecting a call. You might be able to check your messages though, by dialing your answering machine from a payphone. Payphones barely exist anymore, so it would be even more inconvenient. If you need to be reachable at all (nowadays by email/sms), a cell phone is nearly a requi…

My uncle, a top professor at a top 10 US research university didn't have a phone until two years ago. He did fine. In fact, he attributes his significantly higher productivity to not having a phone.

Donald Knuth gave up email in 1990. Too distracting. (I dunno but I wouldn't think he has a cellphone)

When I started grad school in '07 I wanted to forgo a cellphone. I couldn't. My advisor was even annoyed I held out on a smartphone for as long as I did (caved in 2010).

In 2013, sick of my smartphone I went back to a dumbphone. It was great until 2015 when I started working at a place so crappy I have to routinely tether my phone for productive internet access.

My point: it's very possible to live w/out a cell phone. Frankly it's not even hard (I "forget" my phone at home). However, unless you're tenured or are otherwise your own boss, you'll be forced to have one.

Re: Google collects cell tower info even if location services are disabled

#165
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can also set your phone to airplane mode with WiFi and Bluetooth enabled most of the time unless you need 4g for something like driving directions. Google has much better security than the phone companies anyway, so letting the phone companies know where you are is bad enough. I had the idea to "red team" myself and find out if there's a way of finding out my location history from shady online data broker and the…

Unfortunately, we can't even entirely trust our phones then either. You can turn on airplane mode in the OS, but it could still choose to reactivate the radio for short bursts without you knowing. Or the the radio could be set to phone home on a regular basis on its own recognizance. This could potentially occur even if the phone is turned off. There is no way to ever completely trust a cellular device.

This would be easy to check by checking radio signals emitted for the phone. This might be an expensive experiment to set up, but easy to check.

Re: Google collects cell tower info even if location services are disabled

#166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As mentioned in the reply to the sibling comment, we can't know for sure unless we have source code.

How would having the iOS source code show you that Apple is selling data?

If Apple claims to care about protecting privacy, the onus is on them to prove that they actually do, e.g. by publishing the source code to show everyone that it doesn't collect anything.

Otherwise, the assumption is that they do.

Re: Google collects cell tower info even if location services are disabled

#167
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In India, it’s about $309 today. So about three times the average monthly wage if the numbers I find are right. (Sneak edit) Just to write it down another way, that means 25% of the average yearly income. For a phone.

So, get one second hand and it will be even cheaper. The point was it is not $700 for security.

@literally: Yes, and with updates they're so slow as to be unusable. Apple also doesn't permit OS downgrades, truly crippling all older iOS devices.

Re: Google collects cell tower info even if location services are disabled

#168
post #63

It's amazing to me how many comments here excuse Google's behavior by offering the impractical "solution" of just not using a smartphone (a false dilemma) when the obvious answer is to get an iPhone. That's the advice of pretty much everyone in the infosec field and I'm sure some of them will attest to that in this thread.

Apple provides a black box with iOS, they have full control. Maybe the next iOS update comes with privacy intrusion because it's more lucrative. A more sensible way of dealing wirh the issue would be to use an open source Android version like AOSP or LineageOS, not run proprietary gapps, and replace its functionality with F-Droid, MicroG and Yalp-store. Your location will stay out of Apple's/Google's hands and you ca…

I'm grateful for Google's work on Android but iOS or any closed source code being black box is ridiculous.

Reverse engineering and analysis techniques gives us enough ways to look into that so called "black box" and see what's going on.

So if Apple one day ships iOS with privacy intrusion built in, they will be caught.

I prefer to trust the motives, i.e. Apple doing reasonable things and staying away from funny business because they want to sell me iPhones.

Re: Google collects cell tower info even if location services are disabled

#169
post #142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They were making a related but cogent point about the security implications of Google having this info versus the cell phone carriers. It did not, directly or even by implication, contradict anything you wrote – you're right that this is a privacy violation, but I didn't interpret the comment to which you replied as denying that.

It absolutely is relevant, let's take a moment and review the key point: > I can guarantee you Google protects this data more securely than your carrier does Part of acting as a company who cares about user's data includes not collecting data that is sensitive. This is especially true with location data, and is extra especially true when you do it anyway without the user's permission. Acting like this proves to me, t…

No, you're still misunderstanding. The comment is only comparing how well secured the data by whoever holds it. The claim is ONLY arguing that Google would secure the data once they have it better than carriers would. It is not arguing that Google is better at "acting as a company who cares about user's data".

Re: Google collects cell tower info even if location services are disabled

#170
post #81
post #63

It's amazing to me how many comments here excuse Google's behavior by offering the impractical "solution" of just not using a smartphone (a false dilemma) when the obvious answer is to get an iPhone. That's the advice of pretty much everyone in the infosec field and I'm sure some of them will attest to that in this thread.

I tell all my friends / family to get an iPhone if they are upgrading. I used iOS and Android phones and I like both. However it makes even me nerveous to use a banking application or similar on an Android. Can’t imagine what kind of shit my dad would have running on an Android device with all the fake fishing apps, bloatware, tracking etc going around. With a non jailbroken iPhone I have a lot more peace of mind.

I have an Android phone, but I would never use it (or an iPhone for that matter) to log into my bank account.
Post reply on HN