Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Their current process must cost them a lot of talent reply They optimize to reduce false positives. They're completely fine with false negatives. They don't have any shortage of talented engineers willing to interview there. That last bit is why I think it's quite silly for smaller/unknown startups to be copying Google's interview process, as seems to be the trend.
>>They optimize to reduce false positives. They're completely fine with false negatives. Getting too many false negatives is a very sure way of getting a lot of false positives. >>They don't have any shortage of talented engineers willing to interview there. You might be wrong there. Apart from huge money opportunities, there are little incentives for any body to waste their best years in large company political midd…
It's...amusing that you brush that off like it's nothing.
Not to mention things like job security(people have families ya know?) and that having Google on your resume is still a powerful boost for future opportunities. That might not be true someday, but for now it is.