Earlier quoted context omitted.
You know, there is justification for lobbying, and to some extent I would even say it is a strength of our society rather than a weakness. Lobbying informs decision makers, in a non-neutral manner, about what they regulate from the perspective of people actually subject to the regulation produced. That is a very valuable thing if you compare it to the alternative. In societies where this is absent it leads to incredi…
Like intuit lobbying for not making tax simple? Like Microsoft lobbying that US govt use their cloud? Or the big military suppliers lobbying to increase military budget? Or health insurance companies and big pharmacy lobbying hard so Americans would rather commit suicide than get proper healthcare? The system has been effectively well gamed by the big cos and politicians.
Shenzhen is a hothouse of innovation
161–166 of 166 posts
Re: Shenzhen is a hothouse of innovation
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're right. Freespeech wasn't DARPA's motiviation. However it was the motivation of at least one of the engineers of ARPANET. "My bias was always to build decentralization into the net. That way it would be hard for one group to gain control. I didn’t trust large central organizations. It was just in my nature to distrust them." -- Robert (Bob) Taylor That's from the Issacson's book.
Sure, as long it's made clear that DARPA's motivation has no intention of freespeech, and DARPA is the main driver behind early internet research.
Re: Shenzhen is a hothouse of innovation
#163The "maker movement" is alive in Shentzen, but mostly dead in Silicon Valley. TechShop is mostly crafters, not people building anything innovative. Hacker Dojo is appslaves. If there's a maker space in Silicon Valley with a pick and place machine, I can't find it.
>The "maker movement" is alive in Shentzen There is no Maker movement in Shenzhen- there are well-equipped spaces we show to tourists, there is no Maker Movement in the usual use of the word. Go check- no Github repositories, no posted projects anywhere. It's entirely fake- and the money well spent because people believe it despite there being no actual output.
Re: Shenzhen is a hothouse of innovation
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pick and place machines are used for volume pcb production - not the kind of thing one would expect to find in your average maker space AFAIK.
Sudo room just got one!
Re: Shenzhen is a hothouse of innovation
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a fellow Chinese who's been living in the West for a few years, I feel obligated to speak out against this: Although I hold strong dissent against Chinese government in many aspects (in particular censorship, e.g. GFW), although I agree the traditional norm of Chinese culture and society does not commend rebellions, your argument is a slippery slope at its best. Essentially, you are exaggerating from both ends: a.…
Maybe I should have elaborated more on a really sensitive issue. I'm not saying that it's impossible to climb Mt Everest with an extra 50lbs on your back that isn't useful for mountaineering, but it's much harder. i.e. Innovation may happen but the rate of innovation is much lower as well as the impact If my post is 'utter nonsense' then prove it with better arguments These comments remind me of the time when I refus…
Re: Shenzhen is a hothouse of innovation
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe I should have elaborated more on a really sensitive issue. I'm not saying that it's impossible to climb Mt Everest with an extra 50lbs on your back that isn't useful for mountaineering, but it's much harder. i.e. Innovation may happen but the rate of innovation is much lower as well as the impact If my post is 'utter nonsense' then prove it with better arguments These comments remind me of the time when I refus…
Well, I'm not saying your entire post is nonsense, but rather your choice of examples and citations. And here again, the example that you used to refuse believe Mao contributed to the famine or cultural revolution has nothing to do with this discussion. And in your original post, those random success "secrets" you cited really don't help your argument.
If my argument is so weak, do you have any stats and facts to destroy it?