Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mine too, especially for the light version for non-retina OSX!
I'm particularly fond of semi-bold. I find light is too narrow for my vision and taste. After a while of using the light version, it starts to blur together, but semibold works well. But my wife uses light and regular on her high DPI Lenovo.
Hack: A typeface designed for source code
161–170 of 249 posts
Re: Hack: A typeface designed for source code
#162Re: Hack: A typeface designed for source code
#163Font designers never seem to consider tight line spacing as a potential selling point, and that makes me sad. :-( In fact, wider line spacing is sometimes touted as an advantage, for readability.
Re: Hack: A typeface designed for source code
#164Re: Hack: A typeface designed for source code
#165When using a text editor or IDE that does not allow the user to adjust the line spacing (aka "leading"), my choice of programming font for the last 1.5 decades has been Lucida Console. It has tighter line spacing than any other monospaced font I've seen, thus displaying more lines of code within a window of a given height. Every time I hear about a new font designed for source code, I try it out, and am consistently…
Re: Hack: A typeface designed for source code
#166Why does source code have to be shown in fixed width? I've been using non-fixed width fonts for about a year now and I find it much nicer on the eyes. The only downside I've found is that sometimes things don't line up quite as nicely, which is purely cosmetic.
> ...which is purely cosmetic.
You've answered your own question. I do this for a living; I want to look at something I like to look at.
But to each their own.
Re: Hack: A typeface designed for source code
#167Re: Hack: A typeface designed for source code
#168Hack is DejaVu sans mono. Below is a gif I took switching between DejaVu sans mono and Hack. Aside from line height I fail to see the difference. http://gfycat.com/SomberUnitedGermanshepherd
They do acknowledge the source of the font: "Hack has deep roots in the libre, open source typeface community and includes the contributions of the Bitstream Vera & DejaVu projects." It's a bit disingenuous though. I'd call Hack a straight copy of Deja Vu Sans Mono, with a few very minor tweaks. On Linux using the TTF fonts I can't even see a difference in line height: http://i.imgur.com/wxTr0at.png http://i.imgur.co…
Re: Hack: A typeface designed for source code
#169Hack is DejaVu sans mono. Below is a gif I took switching between DejaVu sans mono and Hack. Aside from line height I fail to see the difference. http://gfycat.com/SomberUnitedGermanshepherd
They do acknowledge the source of the font: "Hack has deep roots in the libre, open source typeface community and includes the contributions of the Bitstream Vera & DejaVu projects." It's a bit disingenuous though. I'd call Hack a straight copy of Deja Vu Sans Mono, with a few very minor tweaks. On Linux using the TTF fonts I can't even see a difference in line height: http://i.imgur.com/wxTr0at.png http://i.imgur.co…
Re: Hack: A typeface designed for source code
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
Monaco 10 is the only true code font :) That is, until I get myself a retina Mac, of course. Then I'll use an undecided vector font and the last remaining piece of resistance from classic Mac will be gone.
So true! The only thing I dislike about my retina Mac is that Monaco 10 no longer looks right.
https://discuss.atom.io/t/why-is-the-text-display-inferior-t...