Live data from Hacker News

GitHub's down?

news.ycombinator.com

151–154 of 154 posts

Re: GitHub's down?

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've got about 3 different checkouts of my code on my laptop right now, and each of my coworkers has at least one...

Again, how does that get to the build box? I also have several local copies of my code on my computer, but that doesn't help the Jenkins machine get it unless I scp (or whatever) it over.

You can copy whatever files you want with SCP or SFTP or any number of file transfer protocols.

Re: GitHub's down?

#152

I read about Github being down and know that it sucks for many people. What I find interesting is thinking about how quickly so many installations of distributed version control adopted a de facto central server. Github is a platform that should not need a particularly high uptime from the point of view of any one user. But of course it does because so much of its utility is that it substitutes for a lower level part…

> Github is a platform that should not need a particularly high uptime from the point of view of any one user. This is totally false. GitHub doesn't just provide a git server, it also provides ticketing and project management. When GitHub is down, projects that rely heavily on, for example, commenting on issues grind to a halt. Yes, you don't need GitHub to be up 99.999% of the time to do a `git push` every once in a…

Agreed with you. There are gists which people curl or wget from the servers. Github is not exactly like source forge or something like that....

Re: GitHub's down?

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Github is a platform that should not need a particularly high uptime from the point of view of any one user. This is totally false. GitHub doesn't just provide a git server, it also provides ticketing and project management. When GitHub is down, projects that rely heavily on, for example, commenting on issues grind to a halt. Yes, you don't need GitHub to be up 99.999% of the time to do a `git push` every once in a…

Agreed with you. There are gists which people curl or wget from the servers. Github is not exactly like source forge or something like that....

Sounds like a poor choice if you're curling scripts from GitHub

Re: GitHub's down?

#154
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you have any support for those assertions? In particular, the backup claim is rather dubious unless you're redefining “backup” to be a much higher bar than most common answers meet.

Git is a distributed revision control system and designed as such. The fact it can be used as a back-up tool doesn't mean it should be used as a back-up tool, especially when there are back-up solutions designed from the ground to do just that.

But what you actually said was “Github/git is not an appropriate backup strategy”. Git is tamper-evident and uses strong hashes to protect against bitrot, has full change tracking and numerous measures to avoid data-loss becoming permanent if you detect human error before weeks/months go by, has integrated remote tracking so you can tell how stale your off-site copies are and trivially update them, and most server implementations allow as much access control as you desire.

Assuming that we're talking about things which are already stored in Git and not e.g. an HD video collection, what would make your original statement true?

Post reply on HN