Live data from Hacker News

Rubygems.org AWS bill for Feb 2014 [pdf]

dropbox.com

151–153 of 153 posts

Re: Rubygems.org AWS bill for Feb 2014 [pdf]

#151
Why was this even posted? Looking for help reducing it? Complaining about the amount spent? Looking for a pat on the back?

I saw a talk at Ruby/RailsConf about the work spent building and maintaining rubygems.org. It smelled a bit martyrish. "Look at the thankless work we perform behind the scenes".

Well, if help is required building or operating rubygems.org, please just say so. As a seasoned Ruby developer I'd be more than happy to contribute development time, and as a daily user I'd be willing to commit financially in a small way towards operating costs. Not that that is required - given all the offers of free hosting this post received in response.

If we don't know about a problem, we can't help. Just ask if help is what you want. It's not like the Ruby community doesn't have great communication channels.

Re: Rubygems.org AWS bill for Feb 2014 [pdf]

#152
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> which costs less than the fully-loaded cost of a single billing clerk in your local municipal water department. To be fair, a lot of maintenance value goes into the software that is never quantified. Broken software breaks hard, not partially, so maintenance is even more crucial.

When a levy breaks people die. Software maintenance and damage is nothing compared to real engineering.

Real engineering projects every day use software—I don't think you can realistically draw a line between the two, even if there are different auditing standards.
Post reply on HN