Earlier quoted context omitted.
My only takeaway from the thread was that you approached the process of patch review begrudgingly, and seemed to assume that everyone should understand/appreciate your node-derived vocabulary and design. Each iteration of the patch was provided with a whine about whether it was ready for inclusion yet ... when the reality is, that as the patch author, it's your job to make sure there aren't more bugs and the patch is…
Nothing you've said is true.
And nothing you've said is true. Fortunately everyone can compare our subjective realities against the actual thread.