Earlier quoted context omitted.
...the other kind of indians. In an American context, it is understandable to think "Indian" signifies " American Indian". Now that East Indian immigration verges on outnumbering American Indians, that will probably change, but it's pretty silly to get offended by historical geographical misunderstandings. I mean, let's vilify Columbus for the right reasons. Besides, what's wrong with Native Americans? Why would it b…
> ... by historical geographical misunderstandings If only it were just historical ! > Besides, what's wrong with Native Americans? Nothing! That's an excellent term. > Why would it be a put-down to share a name with them? I never said anything about it being a put-down. To me, it's just annoying when people write "Indian" and assume that it will be understood to mean "Native American". My point (with bringing up Dan…
Is that also "annoying" to you? After all, some hillbilly somewhere might not appreciate the many nuances of differing cultural practices between Sumatra and Tamil Nadu. Worse yet, she might not even care! Is there any aspect of any European language that doesn't annoy you?