Obligatory as always: https://european-alternatives.eu/categories
That website is no longer worth pointing out. The person running it cannot be contacted by others so the offerings and details are frozen in time.
is there an alternative?
Statichost.eu – European static site hosting
151–160 of 266 posts
Re: Statichost.eu – European static site hosting
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean, versioning is basically free from a technical / storage / time spent standpoint, and my experience says that if you don’t do it you likely will lose your code at some point
If you're making static websites, there's no code to lose.
Is that why even Google Docs has version control?
Re: Statichost.eu – European static site hosting
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean, versioning is basically free from a technical / storage / time spent standpoint, and my experience says that if you don’t do it you likely will lose your code at some point
If you're making static websites, there's no code to lose.
Second order code loss: make a change, realize you screwed everything up, unable to revert
Re: Statichost.eu – European static site hosting
#154Re: Statichost.eu – European static site hosting
#155[flagged]
Re: Statichost.eu – European static site hosting
#156[flagged]
Huh, why not 100%? Both Germany and United Kingdom is in Europe, last time I checked. Bunny is located Slovenia as well, also Europe.
Re: Statichost.eu – European static site hosting
#157Re: Statichost.eu – European static site hosting
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be fair you can have versions and backups even if you don't use a versioning tool like git. Good old _v2, _v3, _v4.
Fair, but like, why??
Simpler. Or you work/collaborate on projects with people who really shouldn't have to learn Git, even via a GUI.
I'm a programmer by trade and do plenty of versioning via _v1 and so on when working on music with others, we basically send .zip files over Telegram and append some label at the end. Not gonna ask these people to learn something when basic "have many copies" does the trick sufficiently good.
Re: Statichost.eu – European static site hosting
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
Huh, why not 100%? Both Germany and United Kingdom is in Europe, last time I checked. Bunny is located Slovenia as well, also Europe.
Many people can't tell EU and Europe apart.
There is something special about the combination of people posting something thinking it's some gotcha, then they completely misunderstood both what the thing is, and what they're trying to point out, hilarious.
Re: Statichost.eu – European static site hosting
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
The amount of Codeberg FUD one can encounter on HN is unreal. I'm starting to question whether there's an organized effort behind it. Both personal and private repos are explicitly permitted in the Codeberg TOS: > Private repositories[…] allowed for really small & personal stuff like your journal, config files, ideas or notes, but explicitly not as a personal cloud or media storage.
As if there wasn't a massive amount of nuance between "you may keep your dotfiles private but don't upload your photo library". If their rules read this arbitrary, I wouldn't trust them to host any of my stuff, especially considering that you always have to hope they don't change their rules any further. Assume you did some local LLM stuff in June that worked with a 200MB set of various jpegs and you wanted to keep i…
> , I wouldn't trust them to host any of my stuff, especially considering that you always have to hope they don't change their rules any further.
Yeah, I think this is a win-win for both parties.
You strike me as someone who would "ride along the lines of the terms of service" basically, and you'll see anything not explicitly forbidden as being allowed essentially.
While Codeberg is a project driven by humans, with human reactions to what's happening. If you're not comfortable with rules not being 100% defined, and requiring a humans value judgement to be had to figure out if the rule is broken or not, I don't think Codeberg is for you.
The rest of us, who are OK with humans making decisions rather than just going by what's written in rules, are fine with this, because we know our private repositories won't be deleted. And if they are, you'll be able to speak with a human to explain, and if your intention is fine and good, they'll be OK with it. But if you try to argue about some "That wasn't explicitly stated", then yeah, they'll probably get tired of you quickly.
Think your participating in your local user group vs some corporate/government forum, the rules will be enforced differently.