Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Previewing GPT‑5.6 Sol: a next-generation model

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

151–160 of 797 posts

Re: Previewing GPT‑5.6 Sol: a next-generation model

#151

Post by arizen »

seviu wrote: post #77
jdw64 wrote: post #44

I think GPT writes code the best. How well will it write in version 5.6? It gives me chills. Recently, I went head-to-head with GPT on nearly 2,000 lines of code, and GPT's solution was superior and faster. I even referenced multiple codebases on GitHub while trying, but they were incomparable to GPT. So using GPT brings both fear and excitement. The fear comes from realizing that this level of code is now the averag…

I am on the opposite camp. Open models are starting to perform better. GPT 5.5 keeps on messing things up. On the contrary, pi + glm + DeepSeek… bliss. Fable was a different kind of beast though. Rip.

Ditto on GLM 5.2 + DeepSeek V4 Flash combo.

For most important work (complex, cross-domain inquiries etc.), I still rely on Codex GPT 5.5 though.

Re: Previewing GPT‑5.6 Sol: a next-generation model

#153

Post by svachalek »

paxys wrote: post #88
amunozo wrote: post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But you have multiple providers, not just one.

And every single one of those providers would buckle under government pressure. Fable itself is hosted on all major cloud providers. How many offer it today?

More importantly, the download is out there. You can download it yourself today, and if it's that important to you, you can buy the hardware too.

Re: Previewing GPT‑5.6 Sol: a next-generation model

#154

Post by therepanic »

GTP wrote: post #141
loufe wrote: post #4

"Next generation model" If it was the next generation, why isn't it a major version change..?

Some assume it was to try to slip under the radar and avoid being limited by the government as they did with Fable.

By all appearances, they did not succeed in doing so.

Re: Previewing GPT‑5.6 Sol: a next-generation model

#156

Post by derwiki »

vatsachak wrote: post #82

All of these LLMs are getting better at being at an LLM But GPT-5.5 is as useful an LLM can be; it has solved lemmas I've thought about for a year, it can implement typed STLCs in Rust when I give it a formal grammar, it can help me analyze Postgres planner dumps. It's great at tasks that have short solutions but - they cannot learn based on a project - their long term planning capabilities are worse than worms - the…

Totally agree! They also conflate things all the time (a major type of hallucination) and IIUC that can’t be solved with the current architecture, just patched over

Re: Previewing GPT‑5.6 Sol: a next-generation model

#160

Post by alansaber »

da_grift_shift wrote: post #61

Flagged activity can also trigger account-level review across relevant conversations and risk signals, consistent with our terms and policies around content retention and review. Looking beyond a single conversation helps our systems distinguish persistent malicious behavior from legitimate dual-use security work, where similar technical concepts may appear in very different contexts. Fascinating! Every conversation…

... they have been doing this the entire time
Post reply on HN