Live data from Hacker News

The Art of Money Getting

kk.org

151–160 of 239 posts

Re: The Art of Money Getting

#151

> They take whatever job pays and spend decades fighting upstream. I suspect that this affects a lot of folks in tech. There's a lot of money to be made, so people get into it. They don't really like what they do, so it's always a chore. Their work often shows it, too. I'm retired. I don't have to write software, but I spend more time writing software (for free), than I did, for most of my career. I like the Integrit…

> I'm retired. I am not. And I am really wary of retirees giving advice on skipping the grind, enjoy life and choose a warm feeling job. I don’t have a house and if next round of layoffs hits, it is a ticking clock for my family. I’ll take extra bucks please.

It’s interesting that recounting personal experience is considered “giving advice.”

BTW: I’m not retired by choice. I just found out -the hard way- that a significant portion of today’s tech workforce doesn’t want to work with people with gray hair. It’s a possibility that this could be a shared experience. We all get old, at some point.

I’m extremely grateful to advice I was given, decades ago, about the importance of saving and investing for retirement.

Re: The Art of Money Getting

#152

Nobody is going to seriously discuss moneymaking tips from 1880, right? …right?

Because people now are so wildly different from people 150 years ago? We are exactly the same, with slightly shinier toys.

I don’t know where to even begin, if you don’t see any difference between 1880 and 2026.

Re: The Art of Money Getting

#153
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think this is the comment that drives me off this site permanently. It’s been a good decade and a half.

Why?

it's evidently a dig at Trump and Republican morals, although if you were inattentive you might expect that it was the opposite.

The giveaway is the "in 2026", which implies that it would not be a dark joke in other years.

Thus the poster is evidently indicating that:

The legal system has been undermined and been shown to have no integrity because it allows illegal actions by the rich and the political class.

Journalism has been undermined because major media outlets have been purchased by rich people who only allow the media to publish pro-conservative, pro-rich, talking points.

Healthcare is a larger stretch for their dark joke, but the governmental agency that sets the rules for healthcare research and what are the socially approved recommendations is run by RFK Jr. who is a well-known anti-vaxx guy, also the U.S has left WHO and may not get access to WHO data anymore, and last year the CEO of an insurance company got shot basically for denying insurance claims for healthcare, indicating some level of corruption. There may also be more dark joke levels in regards to healthcare if one is a female.

Accounting is also something of a stretch, but there are governmental shenanigans where common accounting practices are involved that indicate corruption and that might make you feel like "accounting, what a joke" /strawman quotes there

That, at any rate, is what I suppose can only be meant by the somewhat obtuse phrase dark joke in 2026.

On edit: no wait, CEO of United Healthcare got shot at the end of 2024.

Re: The Art of Money Getting

#154
HN front page : "Avoid debt like plague"

Soon on HN front page : "How the richest people on earth used VC money and the lever effect to inflate the valuation of their startup (not even 'built in rust !') to kickstart a 'buy - borrow - die' cycle"

Re: The Art of Money Getting

#159
post #156

with an unexplained circus trick the article jumps from Barnum's 20 rules to "here are the four core principles" --- why these four? I love project Gutenberg to provide the rest. it's a short pamphlet: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/8581/8581-h/8581-h.htm

Thank you for the link - I was just thinking that there were some core principles missing imo and yet there they are in the full text

For me "Persevere" is probably the main one, many people in the comments here mention the difficulty of making it in a niche field, one that you love and are good at. Personally I lived in a tent/garage for 5 years before finally becoming successful.

Also "Location" resonates. I had to move to a new city when I was starting out due to over saturation in my field at home.

Re: The Art of Money Getting

#160
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why?

it's evidently a dig at Trump and Republican morals, although if you were inattentive you might expect that it was the opposite. The giveaway is the "in 2026", which implies that it would not be a dark joke in other years. Thus the poster is evidently indicating that: The legal system has been undermined and been shown to have no integrity because it allows illegal actions by the rich and the political class. Journal…

> ...although if you were inattentive you might expect that it was the opposite.

Speaking as a USian:

If one hasn't been paying attention, one might have missed the deterioration of the courts and law enforcement apparatus, the normalization of many types of fraud (accounting included), the consolidation of news companies and subsequent decimation of effective investigative journalism, as well as the gradual deterioration of healthcare over the past several decades (with bonus acceleration of the healthcare deterioration around 2019 when folks decided to get the fuck out of a profession run by people who evidently gave few shits about the safety and wellbeing of its practitioners and the efficacy and timeliness of the care given to those served by it).

I'll not claim that this Administration isn't the most visibly worse one we've had in quite a while, because that's plainly untrue. This Administration does do absolutely awful things that -in a just world- folks would be tried and imprisoned for, and do those things very loudly and visibly. But, well, there's a lot of precedent for Administrations doing (and/or turning a blind eye to) just godawful things.

Post reply on HN