Live data from Hacker News

Dumb ways for an open source project to die

nesbitt.io

151–155 of 155 posts

Re: Dumb ways for an open source project to die

#151
post #145
post #131

Good list, but the most dumbest way was how perl11.org died. The guy who paid for the domain, didn't pay the domain fee anymore without telling anyone else. So we lost it. And then gave up.

FOSS projects should register their domains with providers that allow anyone to pay the fee for a domain, even if they don't own it. then, instead of depending on one person, anyone in the community can pay directly to ensure that the domain is renewed.

Good idea. Which providers allow this?

Re: Dumb ways for an open source project to die

#153

I don't recognize any such thing as a "dead open source project". If one project is dead, what makes another one alive? Recent updates? It's working as intended and no updates needed or worth the effort. Even if "working as intended" only means it works on some old platform and no current one. Other users? Why do I or you or anyone care about that? Other users only matters for commercial software where you are sellin…

Tell that to CVEs

Tell me how they matter.

They don't. If some code is so old or un-used that you would call it "dead" then there are no cve's on it. No one is using it to discover a vulerability, no one is studying it to find a vulnerability, who writes these supposed cves?

Even if by some miraculous combination of unlikely contrived coincidenses, someone researches, discoveres, writes up, and submits a cve, and the tracking orgs accept and publish it, so what? You just called it "dead" so who does it affect? What does this "cve" matter?

If they do matter because there are users, then it's not "dead".

It's just code that exists that may or may not be useful or interesting to someone sometime for something, or not, like a novel or song or painting.

If it's half-baked code with some problem if it were used exactly as it sits with no further work, so what?

Re: Dumb ways for an open source project to die

#154
post #151
post #145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FOSS projects should register their domains with providers that allow anyone to pay the fee for a domain, even if they don't own it. then, instead of depending on one person, anyone in the community can pay directly to ensure that the domain is renewed.

Good idea. Which providers allow this?

i am afraid i don't have a good answer for now. it used to be gandi, and they may still support it, but since they sold out they massively raised the prices so they can no longer be recommended.

Re: Dumb ways for an open source project to die

#155
post #154
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good idea. Which providers allow this?

i am afraid i don't have a good answer for now. it used to be gandi, and they may still support it, but since they sold out they massively raised the prices so they can no longer be recommended.

Yes, I switched from namecheap to gandi some years ago. But it went to shit lately
Post reply on HN