Live data from Hacker News

Student beauty and grades under in-person and remote teaching

sciencedirect.com

151–160 of 535 posts

Re: Student beauty and grades under in-person and remote teaching

#151

A couple things here: 1. This should have a 2022 tag 2. This is ripe "red pill" fodder and many of the comments here are "red pill" coded.

I was wondering about the year. Are schools still doing online course work and exams now? I would think ai concerns would drive even more in person oral test / notebook testing stuff?

Re: Student beauty and grades under in-person and remote teaching

#155

People that have used to be fat, and then lost a lot of weight, will know how brutally different people will treat you. Whereas you'd practically be a ghost before weight loss, random people will suddenly look you in your eyes, smile, even start conversations with you. Some will of course argue that you losing weight will also make you more confident, and thus you become more approachable. I think there's a lot of bi…

>Some will of course argue that you losing weight will also make you more confident Having been one of the people who experienced this (well the inverse, scarily skinny to lean and muscular), the confidence comes entirely from people in your life congratulating you, followed by strangers and new people just having a baseline positive glow towards you. I don't know who came up with that line, it's repeated a lot, but…

Both can be true: A person’s state of mind is affected by people around them.

Re: Student beauty and grades under in-person and remote teaching

#156

One thing I like about China's education system is the Gaokao entrance exams for universities. It doesn't matter if you're rich, poor, ugly, or beautiful. All it matters is how you score. It's as meritocratic as education can be.

Don’t wealthier families hire tutors to prepare their children? That’s what happens in the US with the SAT/ACT. I think you’d need free, universal SAT tutoring available to everyone in order to be more meritocratic.

The actual problem is that we are not blank slates, and wealthy parents tend to be wealthy because they are more intelligent, and likewise give birth to predisposed-to-be-intelligent babies.

I always find it slightly ironic how mother nature gets so much reverence from ostensibly communal types, despite her being the most shamelessly power hungry entity ever conceived.

Re: Student beauty and grades under in-person and remote teaching

#157
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

China IS bad though. Why glaze China so much when you can be impressed by the west instead. All these zoomers grow up on a China propaganda app.

How is China bad? Their education system did take them from absolute poverty to #2 superpower in a few decades.

Oh, no it is very impressive.

I mean from a moral and "care about me" perspective.

Yes Trump bad but USA has done more for EU than China.

Re: Student beauty and grades under in-person and remote teaching

#160
post #61

My first job during and out of college back in 2003, we were entirely remote. We hired exclusively over the phone which resulted in a mix of people that were completely diverse in their backgrounds and at the same time truly qualified to do the work. The company went on to grow quite successfully until it was acquired 6 years later. I feel that zoom and video conferencing allows some of that "appearance" factor back…

> if I had my way, job interviews would be exclusively audio only. Unfortunately, cheating is becoming rampant in remote interviews, especially for early career roles right now. I think companies are moving toward having final interview rounds in person because it’s such an effective tactic to discourage interview cheating.

Forget cheating, we get entirely fake people applying for our positions.
Post reply on HN