The Xkcd thing, now interactive
151–160 of 167 posts
Re: The Xkcd thing, now interactive
#152Re: The Xkcd thing, now interactive
#153Re: The Xkcd thing, now interactive
#154Re: The Xkcd thing, now interactive
#155It looks like the stroke/border is not taken into account in the physics simulation.
for (let re of rects) {
push();
translate(re.body.position.x, re.body.position.y);
rotate(re.body.angle);
- rect(0, 0, re.w, re.h, 2);
+ rect(0, 0, re.w - 1, re.h - 1, 2);
pop();
}Re: The Xkcd thing, now interactive
#156Re: The Xkcd thing, now interactive
#157I would suggest adding the /r/ProgrammerHumor version too: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1p204nx/ac... The AI crank always cracks me up.
The "Whatever Microsoft is doing" bit was always my favorite.
Re: The Xkcd thing, now interactive
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
The undersea cables actually connecting the entire internet. Sometimes sharks just take a bite of them, they're reasonable well protected but it's enough damage to cause outages and disruptions. It's the single pin under everything because there are a limited number of those cables especially in some regions so a single shark can take out the entire internet for some countries. http://www.mirceakademy.com/uploads/MSA…
Do satellite networks not move the needle in terms of capacity/reliability now?