Live data from Hacker News

The Xkcd thing, now interactive

editor.p5js.org

151–160 of 167 posts

Re: The Xkcd thing, now interactive

#155
post #12

It looks like the stroke/border is not taken into account in the physics simulation.

This can be fixed by:

       for (let re of rects) {
         push();
         translate(re.body.position.x, re.body.position.y);
         rotate(re.body.angle);
    -    rect(0, 0, re.w, re.h, 2);
    +    rect(0, 0, re.w - 1, re.h - 1, 2);
         pop();
       }

Re: The Xkcd thing, now interactive

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do satellite networks not move the needle in terms of capacity/reliability now?

I never understand why questions like this get downvoted around here.

They don't, you just have to wait longer than an hour for an accurate rating

Re: The Xkcd thing, now interactive

#157
post #17

I would suggest adding the /r/ProgrammerHumor version too: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1p204nx/ac... The AI crank always cracks me up.

The "Whatever Microsoft is doing" bit was always my favorite.

The depiction of Microsoft as "angry birds coming to indiscriminately fuck everything up" is absolutely on point for Microsoft in 2025/26

Re: The Xkcd thing, now interactive

#158
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The undersea cables actually connecting the entire internet. Sometimes sharks just take a bite of them, they're reasonable well protected but it's enough damage to cause outages and disruptions. It's the single pin under everything because there are a limited number of those cables especially in some regions so a single shark can take out the entire internet for some countries. http://www.mirceakademy.com/uploads/MSA…

Do satellite networks not move the needle in terms of capacity/reliability now?

The capacity of satellite networks is minuscule compared to that of undersea fibre optics.
Post reply on HN