Warren Buffett steps down as Berkshire Hathaway CEO after six decades

Post by conradev » Thu, Jan 01, 2026, 12:51 AM UTC

BrenBarn wrote: post #146

lr4444lr wrote: post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I respect Buffett greatly on a professional level, and think it's the height of arrogance to believe any one of us personally has the moral right to decide which level of lawful activity becomes turpitudinous greed. THAT SAID... My uncle (he's 98) had a passing acquaintance with Buffett during their overlap at Penn, and in the one econ class they shared, he remarked having heard Buffett say in almost salivating eager…

With $150 billion dollars he could have done a lot more than "argue for" changing taxation. If he had spent that money actively fighting for a better system, maybe that'd be worth something. To sit back on your billions and say "aw shucks, this really shouldn't be possible" is not much of an effort. Edit: Some people seem to be misunderstanding me. I'm saying if he thought taxation was unequal or thought wealth inequ…

  He turned 95 years old on August 30. He was 75 when he began giving away his fortune, announcing plans in June 2006 to give away the bulk of his wealth to five foundations, primarily the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. He changed his will in 2024, designating 99.5% of his remaining fortune after his death to a charitable trust overseen by his three children and also announcing in June 2024 that donations to the Gates Foundation would cease upon his death.

Post by tim333 » Thu, Jan 01, 2026, 12:53 AM UTC

scotty79 wrote: post #78

ravenstine wrote: post #2

I wonder how this will affect BRK-B, given that so many investors (or at least the "retail " ones) buy its shares with the assumption that they provide exposure to Buffett's strategy. In any case, I hope Warren can experience not working at all in the few years he likely has left after being alive for over 1/3 of his country's existence!

There's no Buffett's strategy. Market buys whatever Buffett's company bought. That's how he got unusual gains. Moment of fame stretched over 60 year of clipping coupons off of that initial fame. The thing that made it possible was that he was content with his performance and never tried to one up himself. He kept his fame and market interest in him simmering over six decades inatead burning out in one bright flash.

Post by tim333 » Thu, Jan 01, 2026, 12:54 AM UTC

enjeyw wrote: post #144

scotty79 wrote: post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's no Buffett's strategy. Market buys whatever Buffett's company bought. That's how he got unusual gains. Moment of fame stretched over 60 year of clipping coupons off of that initial fame. The thing that made it possible was that he was content with his performance and never tried to one up himself. He kept his fame and market interest in him simmering over six decades inatead burning out in one bright flash.

I used to share a somewhat similar sentiment. I know one anecdote is not data, but his investment in BYD all the way back in 2008 does counter that viewpoint somewhat - his investment success in the BYD case isn’t from other investors following him in, it’s from him identifying BYD as a successful company far before any other major investors did.

Post by N_A_T_E » Thu, Jan 01, 2026, 12:56 AM UTC

BrenBarn wrote: post #146

lr4444lr wrote: post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I respect Buffett greatly on a professional level, and think it's the height of arrogance to believe any one of us personally has the moral right to decide which level of lawful activity becomes turpitudinous greed. THAT SAID... My uncle (he's 98) had a passing acquaintance with Buffett during their overlap at Penn, and in the one econ class they shared, he remarked having heard Buffett say in almost salivating eager…

With $150 billion dollars he could have done a lot more than "argue for" changing taxation. If he had spent that money actively fighting for a better system, maybe that'd be worth something. To sit back on your billions and say "aw shucks, this really shouldn't be possible" is not much of an effort. Edit: Some people seem to be misunderstanding me. I'm saying if he thought taxation was unequal or thought wealth inequ…

Post by tim333 » Thu, Jan 01, 2026, 12:58 AM UTC

jimnotgym wrote: post #13

I read somewhere that Bershire Hathaway had sort of finished it's mission. 40 years ago there were lots of large companies who were very 'inefficient' and BH would come along, invest a lot, and start demanding changes. Company performance would improve and BH would make big $$$$. Now there are few of these and it is hard to do. I don't know enough to know whether it is right or wrong. but I think that is what I read.