Earlier quoted context omitted.
You mean something like HDMI? If you’ve ever tried to plug one of those into the back of a TV, you’ll know it’s still pretty difficult to get it the right way up.
> If you’ve ever tried to plug one of those into the back of a TV, you’ll know it’s still pretty difficult to get it the right way up. That's true, but the difficulty in that case comes from being unable to see the hole or fit into the space between the television and the wall. For example, plugging an HDMI cable into the back of a monitor involves none of the difficulty of plugging an HDMI cable into the back of a T…
James Moylan, engineer behind arrow signaling which side to refuel a car, dies
151–160 of 228 posts
Re: James Moylan, engineer behind arrow signaling which side to refuel a car, dies
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it depends. Especially with PHEVs, which also have a charge port, whose location is determined by charging infrastructure, and which is not IME on the same side as the gas tank opening.
My phev has charging and gas on the same side. I'm american
Re: James Moylan, engineer behind arrow signaling which side to refuel a car, dies
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
That isn’t in conflict with it being bad design.
True. Though im unsure of what would be a better one. Doesnt get much simpler than an arrow. Id think that for a car you own you wouldnt need it after the first few times though.
I like the way EVs have the squiggly hose icon and that tells you everyting.it doesn't depict the charger station, but the plug point on the vehicle.
Re: James Moylan, engineer behind arrow signaling which side to refuel a car, dies
#154Is the side to fill up evenly balanced between cars in average? I imagine there is value to make it close to 50/50 to simplify the logistics at the gas station. I was thinking car manufacturers perhaps had agreed so that some brands do it one way and some do it another
Re: James Moylan, engineer behind arrow signaling which side to refuel a car, dies
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
You mean something like HDMI? If you’ve ever tried to plug one of those into the back of a TV, you’ll know it’s still pretty difficult to get it the right way up.
> If you’ve ever tried to plug one of those into the back of a TV, you’ll know it’s still pretty difficult to get it the right way up. That's true, but the difficulty in that case comes from being unable to see the hole or fit into the space between the television and the wall. For example, plugging an HDMI cable into the back of a monitor involves none of the difficulty of plugging an HDMI cable into the back of a T…
Re: James Moylan, engineer behind arrow signaling which side to refuel a car, dies
#156Re: James Moylan, engineer behind arrow signaling which side to refuel a car, dies
#157Is the side to fill up evenly balanced between cars in average? I imagine there is value to make it close to 50/50 to simplify the logistics at the gas station. I was thinking car manufacturers perhaps had agreed so that some brands do it one way and some do it another
Why would it matter? Just park on any side, I've never been to a fuel station where the hose wouldn't reach to the other side if needed. Or since you said gas and not petrol, is that an American thing? Do you guys have short hoses thah don't reach?
Re: James Moylan, engineer behind arrow signaling which side to refuel a car, dies
#158Re: James Moylan, engineer behind arrow signaling which side to refuel a car, dies
#159Re: James Moylan, engineer behind arrow signaling which side to refuel a car, dies
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
I recall looking at a car to buy, and the salesman toted the gas cap on the right as the "safe side". The logic was, if you run out of gas, you can refill on the side away from traffic. Dumbest design reasoning. Plan the side, for an event most people never experience?! Or if they do, once... and maybe on a rural dirt road, not necessarily a freeway. Probably wanted an excuse for moving it.
Do you also hate airplane regulations for their dumbest reasoning? You know, when they try to avoid one in a million situation saving mere 200 people?
And there is zero indication it will save even one life a decade.
Think of all the drivers pulling over and (gasp!) getting out of their cars for other ressons.