Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

MIT professor shot at his Massachusetts home dies

bbc.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

151–160 of 253 posts

Re: MIT professor shot at his Massachusetts home dies

#151

Post by froglets »

Supermancho wrote: post #87
wat10000 wrote: post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When it comes to small-scale crime like this, the smartest thing is typically not to do it at all. So the people who do it will generally not be very smart.

Indeed, 8:30p is no different from 2p or 10a for the act. It's most likely a matter of happenstance. It happened to be the warmest time of the day (even though it was evening). Maybe the thinking was someone was home to help them find the valuables, maybe not. > 8:30p seems like a dumb time for a home robbery. The assertion that there is some optimization for some specific imagined motivation, is literal fantasy.

Fewer crimes are committed when the weather is bad since criminals avoid going out like everyone else.

Re: MIT professor shot at his Massachusetts home dies

#152

Post by master_crab »

JuniperMesos wrote: post #75

My prediction is that it was a random home invasion robbery committed by someone with multiple previous felonies who had no idea that the person living in the house they were trying to rob was a MIT professor. But I have no more information than anyone else does, I'm making a low-confidence educated guess, and at some point in the near future it's very likely that the professionals whose job it is to investigate seri…

It’s someone he knew. Either a family member or jilted lover. That’s what it always ends up being.

Re: MIT professor shot at his Massachusetts home dies

#153

Post by 1-more »

randycupertino wrote: post #116
foobarian wrote: post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In this day and age who robs homes any more? You'd be liable to get paid to take a bunch of junk away instead

When BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) came to Pleasanton CA my fox-news brainwashed racist aunt and uncle and their neighbors where legitimately convinced black people from Oakland were going to come take BART out from Oakland and steal their TVs. And this was back in the day of the giant bulky heavy-backed rear-projection TVs. I was like... first of all they drive cars now and second of all who is going to take BART to…

> who would want to carry this stupid heavy thing

BART service started in Pleasanton in 1997. In 1992 or 1993 I had a glass CRT TV stolen during a burglary at our house in exurban Connecticut. There's no reason to claim that TV theft is some myth. It was a crime that did in fact happen.

Re: MIT professor shot at his Massachusetts home dies

#154

Post by crazygringo »

qball wrote: post #98
crazygringo wrote: post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How on earth are you making conclusions about the motive of the killer? People also get burgled and shot. Lovers take revenge. A grad student loses their mind. It's entirely irresponsible to suggest that something is being hidden if there's zero evidence so far that someone's religion or political views are even remotely relevant.

And media lies by omission.

Omitting facts that are utterly irrelevant is not lying by omission. The media doesn't report what he ate for breakfast or which brand of clothing he buys either.

People's religion and political views aren't generally considered relevant to a homicide unless there's an indication they had something to do with the motive, at which point they get reported. Otherwise, the media sticks to basic biographical details like occupation and family status.

Otherwise, the media gets accused of sensationalizing things, implying someone's religion is relevant to stir up controversy, etc.

If it turns out this was either a hate crime or a politically-motivated crime, do you really think the media will suppress that? Spoiler: they don't.

Re: MIT professor shot at his Massachusetts home dies

#155

Post by armchairhacker »

mothballed wrote: post #81
ortusdux wrote: post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From ABC - "Authorities have investigated whether his death could be connected to this weekend's Brown University shooting and, at this point, a senior law enforcement official briefed on both cases told ABC News there is nothing to suggest they’re connected." https://abcnews.go.com/US/mit-professor-shot-killed-home-bos...

Authorities and the university have also been asking for tips but then flipping the script as soon as they get them: "Accusations, speculation and conspiracies we're seeing on social media and in some news reports are irresponsible, harmful, and in some cases dangerous."[] Also worth noting... at one point the arrested the wrong guy. They have no clue. And become hostile when people try to come up with one. While scr…

Without further context, I don’t blame them for being hostile towards “Accusations, speculation and conspiracies…on social media and in some news reports”. Remember the Boston bombing? Tips shouldn’t be public.

Re: MIT professor shot at his Massachusetts home dies

#157

Post by JuniperMesos »

wat10000 wrote: post #149
cykros wrote: post #145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

You could have so easily left out the word “leftist” and had a nice point, but instead you chose to start a fight.

You started the fight by making the (leftist-coded) comment about CEOs, that other comment was the response.

Re: MIT professor shot at his Massachusetts home dies

#158

Post by sonotathrowaway »

TiredOfLife wrote: post #107
cmckn wrote: post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This basically never happens, about 100 people die a year in the US during a “burglary gone wrong”. People think it’s common, though; it’s the go-to cover story in almost any Dateline episode.

That's 100 times more than I thought.

Genuinely believing that only one person in America dies in a home invasion is hard to take seriously.

I imagine most preteens in America have a better grasp of reality than the one you’re espousing here.

Re: MIT professor shot at his Massachusetts home dies

#159

Post by wat10000 »

JuniperMesos wrote: post #157
wat10000 wrote: post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You could have so easily left out the word “leftist” and had a nice point, but instead you chose to start a fight.

You started the fight by making the (leftist-coded) comment about CEOs, that other comment was the response.

Huh. I figured "some CEOs do nasty things that get people killed, and get away with it" was a politically neutral observation of fact.

Re: MIT professor shot at his Massachusetts home dies

#160

Post by olyjohn »

1-more wrote: post #153
randycupertino wrote: post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) came to Pleasanton CA my fox-news brainwashed racist aunt and uncle and their neighbors where legitimately convinced black people from Oakland were going to come take BART out from Oakland and steal their TVs. And this was back in the day of the giant bulky heavy-backed rear-projection TVs. I was like... first of all they drive cars now and second of all who is going to take BART to…

> who would want to carry this stupid heavy thing BART service started in Pleasanton in 1997. In 1992 or 1993 I had a glass CRT TV stolen during a burglary at our house in exurban Connecticut. There's no reason to claim that TV theft is some myth. It was a crime that did in fact happen.

Ummm... Something tells me they didn't take the train to come steal your TV.
Post reply on HN