Earlier quoted context omitted.
Blockchain is a very inconvenient database, for sure, but there is a good reason Bitcoin uses it. It had to solve to double spend problem and create a trustless p2p digital cash, while being censorship resistant and having no central authority. Some people around a decade ago started using blockchain for everything where a SQLite db would have been better, because blockchain was the buzzword around that time, and the…
It's stupid because blockchains don't scale. In most other respects they're quite clever.
I wasted years of my life in crypto
151–160 of 1001 posts
Re: I wasted years of my life in crypto
#152What stands out to me is how many smart people spent their best years optimizing around the constraints of a system that was fundamentally misaligned with real-world demand. The tech is fascinating, but incentives turned the whole space into a gravity well for speculation rather than creation. The upside is: once you realize this, you can take all that engineering discipline, resilience and product intuition you buil…
Re: I wasted years of my life in crypto
#153Okay, so if your time felt wasted, that must mean there were better uses of your 20s. But, how else would you have driven towards your goal of building a new financial system?
It was always a pipe dream.
Re: I wasted years of my life in crypto
#154I’d hesitate to say it’s wasted. Aren’t these some of the most complex, electronic, decentralized systems in human history? That skillset is going to be more and more important the more and more computers there are.
There are more phone calls in a day, but orders of magnitude, than Bitcoin transactions. So, no, they aren't even close.
Re: I wasted years of my life in crypto
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's an ingenious solution to achieve a "trustless" currency that prevents double-spending without a central authority. Unfortunately, this solves the wrong problem. Spending money usually involves getting a good or service in return, which inherently requires "trust" (as does any human interaction). Your fancy blockchain is not going to help you if you order something with Bitcoin and no package arrives.
I always thought it was actually an ingenious solution to elections. There's absolutely no reason that a driver's license can't derive a hash that can only be proven and not reversed (for identity); and provides a one-time contribution to a blockchain that contains your vote - which you then receive your block's information when you finish voting. ANYONE can calculate the sums, anyone can verify and proof hashes, ide…
Re: I wasted years of my life in crypto
#156Considering the transaction time and cost, crypto never made sense. As fast as I can tell, it's been pure speculation since its inception.
What? Most of networks nowadays are faster or as fast and cheaper than normal credit card and banking systems.
Re: I wasted years of my life in crypto
#157Crypto is not necessarily just a casino; the tech has value but there is no mass adoption of the currency as of yet. We'll probably see mass adoption of crypto if a crypto can become a store of wealth
Re: I wasted years of my life in crypto
#158Okay, so if your time felt wasted, that must mean there were better uses of your 20s. But, how else would you have driven towards your goal of building a new financial system?
Re: I wasted years of my life in crypto
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's an ingenious solution to achieve a "trustless" currency that prevents double-spending without a central authority. Unfortunately, this solves the wrong problem. Spending money usually involves getting a good or service in return, which inherently requires "trust" (as does any human interaction). Your fancy blockchain is not going to help you if you order something with Bitcoin and no package arrives.
I always thought it was actually an ingenious solution to elections. There's absolutely no reason that a driver's license can't derive a hash that can only be proven and not reversed (for identity); and provides a one-time contribution to a blockchain that contains your vote - which you then receive your block's information when you finish voting. ANYONE can calculate the sums, anyone can verify and proof hashes, ide…
Typically one of the properties people want from elections is the inability to prove to soneone how you voted, e.g. to stop someone from going, prove you voted for my candidate or i beat you up (or dont give you the bribe). Your scheme wouldn't support that.
Re: I wasted years of my life in crypto
#160I've never understood the initial arguments about Bitcoin, no matter how many times they've been explained to me. The block chain is, and always was, an extremely inconvenient database. How anyone, especially many intelligent people, thought it was realistic to graft a currency on top of such a unwieldy piece of technology is beyond me. Maybe it goes to show how few people understand economics and anthropology and ho…