Live data from Hacker News

Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop

tinycorelinux.net

151–160 of 258 posts

Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop

#151
post #4

The site doesn't have HTTPS and there doesn't seem to be any mention of signatures on the downloads page. Any way to check it hasn't been MITM'd?

Because there's big demand to mitm users of an extremely small and limited distribution from 2008?

I swear to god. Won't somebody think of the yaks.

Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop

#152
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Amiga 500 had high res graphics (or high color graphics … but not on the same scanline), multitasking, 15 bit sound (with a lot of work - the hardware had 4 channels of 8 bit DACs but a 6-bit volume, so …) In 1985, and with 512K of RAM. It was very usable for work.

a 320x200 6bit color depth wasn't exactly a pleasure to use. I think the games could double the res in certain mode (was it called 13h?)

You might be thinking of DOS mode 13h, which was VGA 320x200, 8 bits per pixel.

Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop

#154
Tiny Core Linux has a version for Raspberry Pis called piCore [0] that I wish more people would look at, because it loads itself entirely into RAM and does not touch the SD card at all after that until and unless you explicitly tell it to.

Phenomenal for those low powered servers you just want to leave on and running some tiny batch of cronjobs [1] or something for months or years at a time without worrying too much about wear on the SD card itself rendering the whole installation moot.

This is actually how I have powered the backend data collection and processing for [2], as I wrote about in [3]. The end result is a static site built in Hugo but I was careful to pick parts I could safely leave to wheedle on their own for a long time.

[1]: https://til.andrew-quinn.me/posts/consider-the-cronslave/

[2]: https://hiandrewquinn.github.io/selkouutiset-archive/

[3]: https://til.andrew-quinn.me/posts/lessons-learned-from-2-yea...

Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a secure domain to download from as a mirror. For extra high security, the hash should be delivered OOB like on a mailing list but it isn’t

Where is that mirror linked from? If for the HTTP site that’s no better than downloading it from the website in the first place. > for extra high security, No, sending the hash on a mailing list and delivering downloads over https is the _bare minimum_ of security in this day and age.

You can use this site https://distro.ibiblio.org/tinycorelinux/downloads.html

And all the files are here https://distro.ibiblio.org/tinycorelinux/16.x/x86/release/

I posted that above in this thread.

I will add that most places, forums, sites don’t deliver the hash OOB. Unless you mean like GPG but that would have came from same site. For example if you download a Packer plugin from GitHub, files and hash all comes from same site.

Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop

#156

Not to disrespect this, but it used to be entirely normal to have a GUI environment on a machine with 2MB of RAM and a 40MB disk. Or 128K of ram and 400 kb disk for that matter.

Yea, but those platforms were not 64bit

Switch to an ILP32 ABI and you get a lot of that space back

Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you really need the framebuffer in RAM? Wouldn't that be entirely in the GPU RAM?

Computers didn't used to have GPUs back then when 150kB was a significant amount of graphics memory.

The IBM PGC (1984) was a discrete GPU with 320kB of RAM and slightly over 64kB of ROM.

The EGA (1984) and VGA (1987) could conceivably be considered a GPU although not turning complete. EGA had 64, 128, 192, or 256K and VGA 256K.

The 8514/A (1987) was Turing complete although it had 512kB. The Image Adapter/A (1989) was far more powerful, pretty much the first modern GPU as we know them and came with 1MB expandable to 3MB.

Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop

#158
post #83

Not to disrespect this, but it used to be entirely normal to have a GUI environment on a machine with 2MB of RAM and a 40MB disk. Or 128K of ram and 400 kb disk for that matter.

With 320x240 pixels and 256 colors

640x480 with 16 colours was standard in offices in the late 80s.

If you were someone special, you got 1024x768.

Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wondering if it would be a good idea to setup a VM with this. Setup remote connection, and intellij. Just have a script to clone it for a new project and connect from anywhere using a remote app. It will increase the size of the VM but the template would be smaller than a full blown OS Aside from dev containers, what are other options? I'm not able to run intellij on my laptop, is not an option I use Nvim to ssh into…

Ive experimented with several small distros for this when doing cross platform development. In my experience, by the time you’re compiling and running code and installing dev dependencies on the remote machine, the size of the base OS isn’t a concern. I gained nothing from using smaller distros but lost a lot of time dealing with little issues and incompatibilities. This won’t win me any hacker points, but now if I n…

Valid points, completely forgot about that part, and even with installation script, I manage to waste a good amount of time downloading and setting things up.

Question, I use VirtualBox, but I feel it's kind a laggy sometimes, What do you use? Any suggestion on performance improvements?

Post reply on HN