Live data from Hacker News

People want platforms, not governments, to be responsible for moderating content

reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk

151–152 of 152 posts

Re: People want platforms, not governments, to be responsible for moderating content

#151
post #28

If disinformation would treated as copyrighted content then world would be better place.

Facts are public domain and can't be copyrighted (you can only argue your creative expression of them, ex in a textbook, is yours). But I suppose that wouldn't apply to disinformation. So your made up bullshit is yours to keep!

I was referring to the fact that disinformation is helping platforms to make traffic and attract profits, is not seen from a negative impact on society. Copyright content is causing losses therefore is taken seriously in al sort or verifications.

Re: People want platforms, not governments, to be responsible for moderating content

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So are videos of people being punched and stabbed. Those are legal

The sharing and owning of those videos aren't part of the violence as they are with CSAM. That feels evident, right?

Can you explain why?
Post reply on HN