Live data from Hacker News

Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

github.com

151–156 of 156 posts

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#151
post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you also believe it plausible that aside from redacted parts, this module has not been changed in any way on production servers for over 2 years (last commit is spring 2023)?

That's a fair point, it looks like they aren't making much effort to keep this up to date.

i.e., it's not production code and the guy who said it is and claimed to work at Twitter was lying, as previously pointed out. If only some people would read for comprehension before commenting ...

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#152
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a fair point, it looks like they aren't making much effort to keep this up to date.

i.e., it's not production code and the guy who said it is and claimed to work at Twitter was lying, as previously pointed out. If only some people would read for comprehension before commenting ...

It could be old production code.

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#153
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

i.e., it's not production code and the guy who said it is and claimed to work at Twitter was lying, as previously pointed out. If only some people would read for comprehension before commenting ...

It could be old production code.

That's obviously not what "production code" means here. You just said that "Do you also believe it plausible that aside from redacted parts, this module has not been changed in any way on production servers for over 2 years (last commit is spring 2023)?" was a good point, so you know what is meant. And further up in the thread there's "I've always wondered - how can I as a non X engineer be sure that the code on GH is actually deployed on their servers?". I just made the point about ignoring the context and then you do it again. That is indistinguishable from trolling. Feh. No more responses from me.

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are really going to try and say right wingers aren't amplified on twitter? I literally have an account that just follows gaming accounts and I was having to block people throwing out slurs daily

> You are really going to try and say right wingers aren't amplified on twitter? FWIW, they see it - but interpret it as "Twitter being less biased" now, because from their POV, Twitter had a pro-liberal bias before Musk, and is now trending towards what they consider neutral.

rabidly anti-semitic is not "neutral".

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#155
post #153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It could be old production code.

That's obviously not what "production code" means here. You just said that "Do you also believe it plausible that aside from redacted parts, this module has not been changed in any way on production servers for over 2 years (last commit is spring 2023)?" was a good point, so you know what is meant. And further up in the thread there's "I've always wondered - how can I as a non X engineer be sure that the code on GH i…

Seems like a semantic argument over the definition of the term "production code". It's OK for you to use that term differently from anonym29 does. Cheers mate.

Re: Source code for the X recommendation algorithm

#156
post #5

RIP author_is_elon, we hardly knew ye. https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm/issues/236

I don't like the platform or owner at all but this was the first time I really looked at their oss'ing of the algorithm, which 2y ago is longer than I realized.

The fact that this issue still exists at all and that the variables have been improved to some degree seems pretty awesome? There was actually no need for this repo to exist in the first place anyways.

(Not a critique of the post itself but I couldn't find a better place to criticize "automatic anti-Elon sentiment which prevails across the board).

Post reply on HN