Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess it implies human hair.
FWIW, I did not assume human hair.
https://www.bnnvara.nl/joop/artikelen/chinees-mensenhaar-ver...
151–160 of 225 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess it implies human hair.
FWIW, I did not assume human hair.
https://www.bnnvara.nl/joop/artikelen/chinees-mensenhaar-ver...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not deeply knowledgeable here but imagine this depended quite a bit on where you were living in 1100 CE. I think it was fairly rare in Europe, but IDK how well those numbers capture what was common for the majority of the human population living elsewhere.
It was pretty rare even among medieval kings to live to be 70. The first English king to be definitely alive on their 70th birthday (though no longer "in office") was Philip of Spain (jure uxoris) in 1597, so not a medieval king. That is Early Modern Age. Elizabeth I. didn't make it, though barely, and so the next to reach 70 was George II. in November 1753! Only since the second half of the 18th century is it common…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not deeply knowledgeable here but imagine this depended quite a bit on where you were living in 1100 CE. I think it was fairly rare in Europe, but IDK how well those numbers capture what was common for the majority of the human population living elsewhere.
It was pretty rare even among medieval kings to live to be 70. The first English king to be definitely alive on their 70th birthday (though no longer "in office") was Philip of Spain (jure uxoris) in 1597, so not a medieval king. That is Early Modern Age. Elizabeth I. didn't make it, though barely, and so the next to reach 70 was George II. in November 1753! Only since the second half of the 18th century is it common…
I did not dispute that this was likely rare in medieval Europe (for the same reason you cite).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
“Windows Subsystem for Linux” is probably the most confusing example of this (an environment subsystem which provides a Linux userspace to a Windows NT kernel). more intuitive would be to call it a Linux Subsystem for Windows, but presumably for branding purposes they wanted Windows in front.
That one isn't an example of this. It is actually a Windows Subsystem (at least WSL1) that exposes Linux syscalls, so is for Linux userspace programs. There is also the Windows Subsystem for Win32 and there used to be a Windows Subsystem for Unix. Linux Subsystem would be completely wrong, because it is a Subsystem of Windows not of Linux.
Y of X providing Z - Windows Subsystem for Linux.
Y providing X on Z - Linux Subsystem for Windows.
The former is "for [having]", the latter is "for [use on]".
The picture says "enamel-mimicking" and the text says "protective coating that mimics the structure and function of natural enamel", so it looks like a protective layer, not true repair. I've been using a paste with novamin lately, it also creates a protective layer and is also marketed as "repair". I like it and feel some heat when it contacts with teeth, so the chemical reaction must be working. But the marketing l…
Never heard of Novamin but doesn't look promising? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068624/ Conclusion Review shows that Novamin has significantly less clinical evidence to prove its effectiveness as a remineralization agent in treating both carious and non-carious lesion. Hence, better designed clinical trials should be carried out in the future before definitive recommendations can be made.
For Novamin alone, I've seen and understood the claims of sensitivity protection with hydroxyl-carbonate apatite (HCA). The paper explains it in 4.3. The layer is temporary and protects from acids, conserving the teeth tissue below.
But F is essential and my paste has it together with Novamin. It seems they may work well together. But the paper also explains that F works with saliva rich in minerals to repair the enamel. So if Novamin creates a strong layer, it may block access of F + saliva to enamel (my speculation, as in 4.2 they say "A clean tooth surface is required to access the mineral-deficient spot.").
So maybe a classical Ca+F paste is better overnight when no acid exposure is expected, but Novamin is nice in the morning before breakfast.
“Made from hair” is clickbait — the research is about keratin, a common structural protein.
How does this compare with nano-hydroxyapatite, which is the current rage in toothpaste innovation and remineralization?
If keratin toothpastes can be produced more economically they could be a better option for mass adoption. For anyone who wants to try nHA toothpaste for remineralization, I can only recommend Sangi Apagard Royal toothpaste ($$$) but it does work quite well when used as directed.
I’ve been reading about how “X could repair tooth enamel” for years , including on HN. Nothing ever comes of it. I’ll believe it when something exists out of a laboratory and on the market. > The treatment could be delivered through a toothpaste for daily use or as a professionally applied gel Could . In other words, they haven’t even tested if a toothpaste is viable, yet the title is written as if this is a ready-ma…