Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Defense is also an enumerated power of the feds and welfare is not. Every federal social program is backed by a law giving the federal government that power. The Stafford act and social security act for example. >Defense must be handled at the national welfare Why can't defense be per state? If the answer is it's not efficient or coordination then the same could be said for any social program >My "general rule" is t…
The law purports to give the feds that power. I believe the Constitution has been grossly twisted to federalize that which the feds have no authority to do. Social welfare is one of those things. Defense per-state would disrupt the concept of a nation and the feds' ability to operate internationally. This is the same as borders and foreign policy. If anything localities are better able to understand the needs of thei…
But
>The damage a local government can do is necessarily less and the layers of government above it that can check that damage are more