Live data from Hacker News

About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

github.com

151–160 of 179 posts

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#151
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I simply cannot give up the option of zapping distractions off of my screen. I really cannot understand how people can use Youtube or even a Youtube embedded video without zapping away the distractions. There is no way I'm coming back to Chrome if they don't support manifest V2. It's Firefox for me.

I use uBlock origin lite and there are no ads on youtube or embedded youtube videos

There are ads, you wait for them to load, but they are not shown.

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#152

Firefox is fine as daily browser and the few websites that don‘t work in it start working if you enable the chrome mask plugin for them.

If only Firefox would properly support PWAs. I know that there are workarounds like installing the PWAs in Chrome and setting up an extension that redirects links clicked in a PWA to be opened in Firefox, but it is a hassle.

Which PWAs do you use?

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#154
post #18

I tried uBlock Origin Lite for a very short time. Then I realized that in Lite, the user can’t add custom rules[0]. That’s when I had enough. So now I’m using Firefox instead, where I can use uBlock Origin. [0] See https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1in2ls4/ubloc...

Chrome with Ublock origin works through June 2025, via "browsers using the ExtensionManifestV2Availability policy will be exempt from any browser changes until June 2025". Discussion on how to enable: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41812638

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#155
post #136
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Firefox marketshare is dwindling It's basically non-existing already (less than 4% globally) [1] and with basically zero mobile presence. [1]: https://radar.cloudflare.com/adoption-and-usage#top-browsers...

In spite of its dwindling usage, Firefox is still used by more than a 100 million people on desktop. I posted this comment some days ago [1]: To put some numbers on what a 2.54% market share means, Firefox actually tracks this data. See here: https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/user-activity : > Monthly Active Users (MAU) measures the number of Firefox Desktop clients active in the past 28 days. > February 10, 2025: 1…

Probably quite a few people like me who use both Chrome and Firefox.

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#156
post #18

I tried uBlock Origin Lite for a very short time. Then I realized that in Lite, the user can’t add custom rules[0]. That’s when I had enough. So now I’m using Firefox instead, where I can use uBlock Origin. [0] See https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1in2ls4/ubloc...

After trying both, I prefer Matrix to Origin.

However I do not rely on extensions/add-ons as I believe extensions/add-ons are not the right solution. Unless the computer user is compiling the browser herself, extensions/add-ons can be crippled/disabled/etc. by whomever is distributing binaries. When the distributor is supported by online advertising as is the case for both Chrome and Firefox, and all the other so-called "modern" graphical browsers, this possibility cannot be ignored.

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1Blocker on Safari is an excellent experience, and available for iPhone as well where it can remove ads from inside other apps. Letterboxd for example.

Safari's ad-blocking abilities are no more potent than what Chrome's Manifest v3 gives you. In fact, the changes in MV3 were inspired by Safari. I used to work adjacent to a team working on anti-ad-blocking tech. Safari's protections are fairly easy to circumvent, with Adblock Plus not being great either. It was uBlock Origin that was making this team sweat, and they didn't even bother with it. The reason is that wha…

Some adblockers on iOS are using VPNs to block DNS and block ads though and that works in apps too and has nothing to do with webviews.

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#158
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The part where they say they are not developing it further. CEO discussing it further here: https://x.com/joshm/status/1850717644779110643 They have not shipped anything but browser updates and minor fixes for months.

> They have not shipped anything but browser updates and minor fixes for months. I would LOVE my browser to do just that!

firefox ESR?

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#159
post #2

I see people reporting that the extension has already been forcefully removed (or disabled in some cases) from their Chrome. This hasn't happened to me (v133 on MacOS). I have primarily been using Chrome up until this point as I was under the impression that performance (and therefore battery life) is bad with FF on MacOS. Recent results seem to indicate that Chrome is in fact the worst offender [1]. Yesterday I unin…

Anyone looking for a similar experience to Arc, I recommend Zen Browser, based on Firefox: https://zen-browser.app/

Re: About Google Chrome's "This extension may soon no longer be supported" (2024)

#160
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I simply cannot give up the option of zapping distractions off of my screen. I really cannot understand how people can use Youtube or even a Youtube embedded video without zapping away the distractions. There is no way I'm coming back to Chrome if they don't support manifest V2. It's Firefox for me.

And yet 99% of YouTube's users use it as is.

Many people are annoyed but 1) don't know there is any other way, 2) got used to it and the hassle of it is still worth it for them to get to watch the stuff they want.
Post reply on HN