Live data from Hacker News

Pi-hole v6

pi-hole.net

151–160 of 316 posts

Re: Pi-hole v6

#151

5+ year development cycle. Impressive! https://pi-hole.net/blog/2023/10/09/pi-hole-v6-beta-testing/ Any details on what HTTPS support provides, other than a TLS connection to the admin dashboard?

That works for me. It means I don't need to relearn everything every year, and the major versions probably won't be riddled with bugs.

Re: Pi-hole v6

#152

I've been using Technitium for a couple years and been pretty happy with it https://technitium.com/dns/

I moved from pihole to Technitium a few months back because I wanted more DNS features than just adding A and CNAME records.

For example the split horizon features to return different responses to DNS queries depending if I'm connected to my Tailscale network or not has been pretty slick.

I documented that process here in case anyone is interested: https://blog.jamesbrooks.net/posts/technitium-dns-server-wit...

Re: Pi-hole v6

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Is this criticism unfair? Only if you don't trust only Russians and no one else.

I don't trust Iran, North Korea, or China either. It's not hard, I'm an American and it's 2025. These are our adversaries (I didn't choose them) who currently commit cybercrimes against us. Hopefully in 2035 that won't be the case and we can all sing kumbaya.

I hope that you at some point will understand that these are minorities among a huge population that you are talking about.

It sounds like you think that every butcher, barber, dancer, teacher, software dev etc in China is just thinking of how they can hack the US.

Guess what: that's the image propagated by propaganda and very far from the actual truth.

If you don't trust people, study their code and make a formed opinion about it.

Re: Pi-hole v6

#154

I set up pi-hole recently after hearing about it for years. I was kind of surprised at a lack of really basic features (imo): There isn't any kind of "dry run" or "phantom" mode, where requests are not actually blocked, but appear marked in the log UI as "would be blocked". This is super important because I want to see all the things my home network is doing that would be blocked before I actually hit the big red but…

I think [1] is quite irrelevant to be honest. Blocking DNS isn't a destructive operation. I've been using pi-hole for years and I simply block everything and cherry-pick a few exceptions here and there when something breaks. I only had to really troubleshoot maybe 3-4 times in years, and half of that were related to the fact I worked for companies that had domains blocked.

Re: Pi-hole v6

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there an equivalent of DDWRT/OpenWRT but for TVs? Most often those are some embedded linux board running some Android fork, shouldn't there be some TV models on the market that are a good hardware/price deal with firmware that can be replaced? Even something that just permanently shows HDMI input with no popup overlays would be good, but AOSP + VLC/Jellyfin would be even nicer.

Isn't a TV that permanently shows HDMI input a big monitor? Weirdly they always seem to be more expensive than a TV though.

Bare in mind I went down this hole years ago, so these could be solved problems, but in my experience Monitors speak a set of more useful modes (Resolution and refresh rate combos) and tv's often need to be trammed in a bit, the default screen position not being properly centered in all cases.

Re: Pi-hole v6

#156

I've been using Technitium for a couple years and been pretty happy with it https://technitium.com/dns/

Switched to Technitium (from piHole via Docker on amd64 and manual dnsmasq before that) primarily for DNS over HTTPS and never looked back. Used it for DHCP and DNS.

Re: Pi-hole v6

#157

I set up pi-hole recently after hearing about it for years. I was kind of surprised at a lack of really basic features (imo): There isn't any kind of "dry run" or "phantom" mode, where requests are not actually blocked, but appear marked in the log UI as "would be blocked". This is super important because I want to see all the things my home network is doing that would be blocked before I actually hit the big red but…

I think [1] is quite irrelevant to be honest. Blocking DNS isn't a destructive operation. I've been using pi-hole for years and I simply block everything and cherry-pick a few exceptions here and there when something breaks. I only had to really troubleshoot maybe 3-4 times in years, and half of that were related to the fact I worked for companies that had domains blocked.

It's destructive if you can't reach your remote devices anymore. See also jeff geerling's "It was DNS T-Shirt" https://www.redshirtjeff.com/shop/p/it-was-dns-shirt

Re: Pi-hole v6

#158
post #91

In my experience Pi hole is a very worthwhile investment. People who used my internet when I had one would remark how much faster it was. Everything in general seems faster, even things that you wouldn't think of. I typically use Brave for browsing which has good ad blocking capabilities, but this adds a whole additional layer. The only reason I don't use one now is that I travel a lot more so it's irrelevant, and I…

I had an Apple TV connected to a TCL Roku TV and the TV was analyzing video frames from the AppleTV to popup ads suggesting to watch the same content on other streaming services.

Re: Pi-hole v6

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most non-smart 4K screens are more expensive than 4k-smart tv screens though. Really weird, because there's less stuff in it. I just want a nice 50" 4k screen with hdmi and display ports. I don't use all the other junk anyway, since i watch tv via a computer and sounds goes to a surround set.

Is there an equivalent of DDWRT/OpenWRT but for TVs? Most often those are some embedded linux board running some Android fork, shouldn't there be some TV models on the market that are a good hardware/price deal with firmware that can be replaced? Even something that just permanently shows HDMI input with no popup overlays would be good, but AOSP + VLC/Jellyfin would be even nicer.

Because just like virtually everything in the embedded SoC ecosystem outside of the RPi competitor SBC crowd, the TV embedded board likely has a chip with little or no doc (with or without NDA), and unlike a Pi-ish SCB there's probably not even an unsupported, outdated kernel linked with a ton of opaque proprietary blobs hidden on an obscure Chinese language web site to try out.

Maybe there are smart TVs out there with a SoC that's been reverse engineered enough to do something with. If there is, that should be shouted from the rafters. But I kinda doubt it.

Re: Pi-hole v6

#160
post #91

In my experience Pi hole is a very worthwhile investment. People who used my internet when I had one would remark how much faster it was. Everything in general seems faster, even things that you wouldn't think of. I typically use Brave for browsing which has good ad blocking capabilities, but this adds a whole additional layer. The only reason I don't use one now is that I travel a lot more so it's irrelevant, and I…

I used to love pihole, but it seems like it's more trouble than it's worth now. Advertisers have wised up and will use the same subdomain for both content and ads. I've also had issues with normal website functionality being broken due to pihole which isn't fun for my wife. It seems mostly useful for blocking background traffic on smart devices, not so much for ads.
Post reply on HN