Live data from Hacker News

TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

tldw.tube

151–160 of 213 posts

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#151

So what is everyone doing with all this free time they've now accumulated from not reading, watching, or listening to media?

Chatting with AI bots. I agree that this mentality of works being “too long so don’t ingest it”, is not a healthy way to go about life and thinking in general.

It's not that, it's "too long with low information density so ingest it more efficiently." That way we can spend our time on things that are more productive or enjoyable.

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#152
post #30

Idea hackneyed since LLM's appeared. Cool that implementation is open-source, though yt automatic captions are sometimes completely off-point, especially when people talking in the video don't have a diction of a tv show host. I wonder if an idea found it's niche after all? Do you guys summarise you videos to short texts and that leaves you satisfied? For me video is video, I can relax, sit and watch/listen to it. Wi…

> For me video is video, I can relax, sit and watch/listen to it. With text it is different, it is a mental exercise to read and process it, so turning video into text feels like an essential downgrade. Exact opposite for me. Reading goes at my pace, in silence. Video is much more invasive, so I avoid it except for the highest quality stuff.

Interesting, I was always thinking that audio/visual information is naturally much easier to consume. For instance: I can watch a video and count to 10 in my head at the same time – I will still get everything what was in that video – but with text it's a much harder task since the head is fully occupied with "narrating" the text what I'm reading, so reading in the end turns into podcast inside the head before actually get consumed.

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#153
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If the platform and creators are incentivized to waste my time, then why would I support that? I watch and enjoy the content even more knowing that I am not wasting my time.

This is where the snide touch grass comment above was awkwardly pointing. If you feel like you're wasting your time and can't be bothered to do so in a holistically responsible way (supporting the creators at the very least) then perhaps your time would be better spent doing something else. i.e. you may be wasting your time already. I probably shouldn't have wandered into a thread that's ostensibly about ripping off…

Why would I care about responsibility when I waste my time, much less "holistic responsibility?" Sounds like your moral systems are different from others' in this thread.

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#154
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> For me video is video, I can relax, sit and watch/listen to it. With text it is different, it is a mental exercise to read and process it, so turning video into text feels like an essential downgrade. Exact opposite for me. Reading goes at my pace, in silence. Video is much more invasive, so I avoid it except for the highest quality stuff.

Interesting, I was always thinking that audio/visual information is naturally much easier to consume. For instance: I can watch a video and count to 10 in my head at the same time – I will still get everything what was in that video – but with text it's a much harder task since the head is fully occupied with "narrating" the text what I'm reading, so reading in the end turns into podcast inside the head before actual…

I find it much easier to skim texts to find the information I'm looking for. I can't do that with videos unless they have clearly marked chapters.

When I read about a new technology and they have a video instead of a blog post, I just close the browser. If it is useful, someone will probably post a blog on HN at some point in time

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Chatting with AI bots. I agree that this mentality of works being “too long so don’t ingest it”, is not a healthy way to go about life and thinking in general.

It's not that, it's "too long with low information density so ingest it more efficiently." That way we can spend our time on things that are more productive or enjoyable.

> That way we can spend our time on things that are more productive or enjoyable.

That seems like an arms race, how do you know there aren't more productive ways to enjoy your time? Can something less productive be more enjoyable?

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not that, it's "too long with low information density so ingest it more efficiently." That way we can spend our time on things that are more productive or enjoyable.

> That way we can spend our time on things that are more productive or enjoyable. That seems like an arms race, how do you know there aren't more productive ways to enjoy your time? Can something less productive be more enjoyable?

I don't, and yes. I suspect this varies by person.

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#160
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use SponsorBlock (be sure to enable all categories of blocking such as filler content, not just sponsors), DeArrow (de-clickbaits thumbnails and titles) and a video speed changer extension to enable much of your stated functionality, though of course not all. I've saved likely years of watching due to this combination.

YouTube has a speed changer built in. I'm curious what your extension would add.

RIP the Ad Accelerator, which would up the speed upon detection of an ad. Youtube has found a way around it and it no longer works.

https://github.com/rkk3/ad-accelerator

Post reply on HN