What’s even crazier is that the uniparty is like 2 issues away from restoring their kleptocratic stanglehold on the country.
I have no idea what this means.
Elon Musk's Demolition Crew
151–160 of 411 posts
Re: Elon Musk's Demolition Crew
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
The evidence is fairly smacking you in the face. Have you seen the number of Executive Orders that Trump has been signing? Many of which are almost certainly to be overturned?
Yes, what does signing a lot of executive orders have to do with it? Historically-speaking American presidents are using more and more executive orders to push things through. That doesn’t inherently make them bad.
Re: Elon Musk's Demolition Crew
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
Trump got 49.8% of the vote with 63.9% turnout, which would be 31.8% of eligible voters. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidentia...
More than half that voted is all that matters
49.8% is less than half.
Re: Elon Musk's Demolition Crew
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> OK, we have an independent judiciary to decide on the legality. You don't. > Just because you say it's illegal doesn't mean it is. It's illegal to the point it even violates the US constitution. > Biden unilaterally cancelled a trillion dollars of college debt, which the Supreme Court said was illegal, (...) The Supreme Court ruled that the Department of Education didn't had the authority to enact such a large prog…
Re: Elon Musk's Demolition Crew
#155Re: Elon Musk's Demolition Crew
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m curious how you believe elons experience here would be beneficial?
Same way the man that knew nothing about rockets built the company that builds the world’s most sophisticated launch vehicles. By understanding problems and then solving them. I cannot think of a more universally useful skillset.
Re: Elon Musk's Demolition Crew
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
Laws are being broken, Congress is being bypassed, and power is being consolidated by the executive branch and a private unelected citizen. The next part of the playbook is to ignore orders by the court. The goal is to dismantle democracy. The playbook is so obvious - Trump himself even said nobody would have to worry about voting for him again because they would "fix it".
Which law is being broken?
Re: Elon Musk's Demolition Crew
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Something like USAID is established by statute (The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961). It cannot be eliminated or gutted by executive order. Sidestepping this, which is happening left and right currently, is democracy failing.
And the Trump administration was smart to start with USAID. It's been an arm of the CIA since it's origination. Look at the role it played in the Vietnam War - arming of a militia under the guise of "development". It also was the org that funded the fake "polio vaccination campaign" in the search for Bin Laden.
And it's funny to see the pearl clutching going on when only 3-4 years ago there were numerous press reports on just how unaccountable USAID was to the federal government.
Re: Elon Musk's Demolition Crew
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
I doubt it, but hey welcome to the club. Like 1/4 of everything I make goes to social security. But just because I’ve been contributing my whole life doesn’t mean we should double down of a failing program.
> Like 1/4 of everything I make goes to social security. If you want to be taken seriously, don't make false claims. It weakens your other arguments. Social Security is 6.2% (12.4% if self-employed since the employer takes care of half) on the first $176,100 of your net income (which for the median US taxpayer is on all their income). Medicare is 1.45% (2.9% if self-employed, same as Social Security). So if you are s…
Re: Elon Musk's Demolition Crew
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
Comments like this remind me that many Americans genuinely want a dictator It's baffling
How did you come to that conclusion from their comment?
-> which is badly needed
In the US power is divided between three branches of government to prevent any one bench from becoming too powerful through checks and balances. Consolidation of power in one branch would mean unchecked, dictatorial powers.
-> How did you come to that conclusion from their comment?
How did you not?