Live data from Hacker News

Researchers design wearable tech that can sense glucose levels more accurately

uwaterloo.ca

151–160 of 171 posts

Re: Researchers design wearable tech that can sense glucose levels more accurately

#151
post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you say more about the plastic left behind? Polyurethane coating on the cannula?

Been using a dexcom g7 for a few weeks as a test. Pulling the sensor off can be painful, and leaves behind adhesive residue when I do it. And there's also a bit of inflammation in the area since it sticks a small probe into you, which sits there for 10 days.

Lookup beach tar remover

Oil slick is a skin safe tar remover and searching for that using a pummice stone was reccomended on reddit.

Re: Researchers design wearable tech that can sense glucose levels more accurately

#152
post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I assume there's an RF mixer somewhere in there. Edit: read the paper, now more confused

I don’t have access to the full text, but I loved this part: > Commercial CGM devices have certain drawbacks in diabetic measurement during daily activities such as food intake, sleeping, exercise and driving. The drawbacks are continuous radiations from devices So they think a drawback of CGM is the (Bluetooth) radiation, and their alternative is to zap the pancreas with, um, magic dielectric radiation? Or magic rad…

The paper is full text, fyi. You won't get any extra info about actual glucose measurements. The paper is all about their device idea engineering. The press release dose purport to show a pic of a supposed sensor and a vague claim of clinical trials.

Re: Researchers design wearable tech that can sense glucose levels more accurately

#153
post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t have access to the full text, but I loved this part: > Commercial CGM devices have certain drawbacks in diabetic measurement during daily activities such as food intake, sleeping, exercise and driving. The drawbacks are continuous radiations from devices So they think a drawback of CGM is the (Bluetooth) radiation, and their alternative is to zap the pancreas with, um, magic dielectric radiation? Or magic rad…

The paper is full text, fyi. You won't get any extra info about actual glucose measurements. The paper is all about their device idea engineering. The press release dose purport to show a pic of a supposed sensor and a vague claim of clinical trials.

I meant this reference that was being discussed a bit:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105072

The OP paper is a bit lacking in any actual details of how glucose is being detected…

Re: Researchers design wearable tech that can sense glucose levels more accurately

#154

This article is from 2014 and it should be noted as such. Looking at the comments, it's clear people have been misled by the presentation of this article to think this is an emerging technology rather than an old and inappropriate application of one. For others reading; this is about a small radar technology, having nothing to do with research in the detection of blood glucose whatsoever.

> This article is from 2014 How do you know? The date on the article says October 29, 2024

Well, I can agree that now the date on the article is 10/29/2024. When I posted this comment, it was dated 2014. I do see that internet archive has copies of the site that have the 2024 date but not from yesterday. Maybe a dead cmos battery or other time sync error changed the date temporarily yesterday. I don't have any other explanation, but I do respectfully withdraw my former opinion about the article.

Re: Researchers design wearable tech that can sense glucose levels more accurately

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is "my uncle who works at Nintendo said Sony sucks" level information to anyone but you. I do agree on one part regardless of any of that though... I'm at the point of waiting for the one who actually sells me said device instead of the one that says they'll soon be able to.

At this state, they are likely able to do this. Not small enough for your watch but a working stationary device that can RELIABLY monitor your blood sugar. And with blood sugar I don't mean the skin prick test. If people claim they compared to the skin prick test and "it works" they have no idea what they are talking about. You have to compare venereal blood glucose with measured blood glucose and use the Clarke erro…

Got a purchase link?

Re: Researchers design wearable tech that can sense glucose levels more accurately

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At this state, they are likely able to do this. Not small enough for your watch but a working stationary device that can RELIABLY monitor your blood sugar. And with blood sugar I don't mean the skin prick test. If people claim they compared to the skin prick test and "it works" they have no idea what they are talking about. You have to compare venereal blood glucose with measured blood glucose and use the Clarke erro…

Got a purchase link?

No, I could ask if they are able to deliver a stationary device. This would work while sleeping. But it would be very privy because it is custom-made and not delivered in quantities. And even if they can charge you 100k, they may not be willing to do that because it distracts them from their main goal. To miniaturize it and produce it in quantities.

Re: Researchers design wearable tech that can sense glucose levels more accurately

#158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s fair to be skeptical. Personally, I’ll believe it when I see it in action. There’s likely an unexplained catch or they wouldn’t have shared any hard data in the paper. One possibility is that they want to sell this technology to a big company without publicly disclosing all their trade secrets. However, this research could have been sponsored by a public grant, which would have compelled them to share some infor…

> It’s still noteworthy that it was published in Nature. FWIW, it was not published in 'Nature' but in 'Communications Engineering', a journal by Nature Portfolio (formerly known as Nature Publishing Group, part of Springer Nature). It is a new Open Access journal, established only in 2022. Given the track record of their 'Scientific Reports' journal [1], I would be rather cautious regarding the quality of the works…

Ah, very interesting. Thanks for pointing out.

Re: Researchers design wearable tech that can sense glucose levels more accurately

#159
Not T1 or T2 but wore CGM patches for a month. Amazing insight into how your body reacts to foods and food + exercise. Even if this tech isn't accurate enough at first for people who need to manage a disease, it could be amazing for anyone interested in health optimization.

Re: Researchers design wearable tech that can sense glucose levels more accurately

#160
post #133
post #120

Slightly OT, but just last night I finished a 15-day Dexcom Stelo CGM session. If you can afford the $99, I highly recommend it. There is a world of difference between an intellectual understanding of blood glucose and actually witnessing your body maintaining exquisite control over a system dependent on food, exercise, stress, time of day, and the idiosyncrasies of your individual insulin response.

I’ve been looking to try an CGM to see how all those factors affect my blood sugar. Is Dexcom Stelo the best available OTC? How do you like the analytics in the app?

I didn't look at the competition. I knew the Dexcom brand because my friends have had good experiences with the G series, so the Stelo was an easy impulse purchase. I'm neither diabetic nor prediabetic, so I'm not a good representative of those audiences.

For someone glucose-curious like me, the Stelo is just right. The app provides a slightly laggy real-time graph of measurements (collected every 5 minutes and reported every 15 minutes). It uses some heuristics to identify rising/falling events, and it'll notify you for the steeper cases (but I'm not sure about hypoglycemic event notifications, as I had a couple of those while sleeping and found out only when I woke up). On Android, it uses the Health Connect hub to sync some health data with other apps. It provides a rudimentary event-log function to add meal, exercise, and FYI notations. You'll also get a daily time-in-range wrap-up.

The more interesting analytics are in clarity.dexcom.com, which is a website that visualizes data that the app is constantly pushing, with a couple-hour lag. There you will find more graphs, tables that group measurements by day and hour, and various expected calculations (average, standard deviation, CV, calculated GMI). And you'll also find the all-important export to CSV button, which gives you all the sensor data. Using that I was able to import everything to Google Sheets, where I did a linear regression with finger-prick measurements to ascertain the sensor's (mild) deviation.

The Stelo feature set is clearly designed to provide all the data eventually, but not quickly enough to be useful for diabetics who need real-time info for glucose management. That's how they'll continue segmenting the Stelo and G7 audiences. I have no problem with that; if OTC GCM cost continues to drop, and they become as prevalent as annual lipid/metabolic labs, I could see the incidence of lifestyle-attributable T2D dropping, which would obviously have massive benefits to society.

Post reply on HN