Earlier quoted context omitted.
The second cookies are blocked the industry moved to fingerprinting and other methods It's like piracy, there's only so much you can do plugging holes Cookie banners always felt like a feel-good solution. Made worse by inconsistent UIs, differing button texts, long explanations, etc.
> It's like piracy, there's only so much you can do plugging holes I say keep on plugging. When you make a law and bad actors find loopholes, the solution isn't to throw up your hands and say "Well, we tried!" The solution is to continuously refine the law as loopholes are found. Laws should get regular patch releases.
Analysis of economic and productivity losses caused by cookie banners in Europe
151–160 of 395 posts
Re: Analysis of economic and productivity losses caused by cookie banners in Europe
#152Because I use fresh incognito mode for each browsing session, I have to click through those consent popups on every website I visit. Quite frustrating to say the least.
You can use Consentomatic to have it automatically handled. It's from Aarhus University, open source. https://consentomatic.au.dk/
Re: Analysis of economic and productivity losses caused by cookie banners in Europe
#153People blame the cookie banners themselves or the legislation that "made them necessary" but somehow never seem to blame the web companies for doing the naughty things on their websites that make them subject to the law. The "cookie banner problem" exists because it's primarily end users that are shouldering the burden of them, and not the companies. For the company, it's a one time JIRA ticket for a junior software…
Re: Analysis of economic and productivity losses caused by cookie banners in Europe
#154Hop into your uBlock Origin settings and enable the Cookie Banner filters. Fixed. Enable the Annoyances filters too, while you're in there. If you're on iOS, the Kill Sticky bookmarklet does a decent job of cleaning these up without breaking most sites: https://www.smokingonabike.com/2024/01/20/take-back-your-web...
Which works on Chrome, Firefox and iOS.
The best part is that you can actually specify your preferences, but globally for all websites. I actually prefer to have the functionality cookies enabled.
Re: Analysis of economic and productivity losses caused by cookie banners in Europe
#155The whole thing is a colossal waste too, it was a law written by people who don't understand tech for special interest groups who don't want to actually make things better. If you don't want a website doing something on your computer, you start with the browser, not the website.
Future headlines after a browser compliance law made - “EU is destroying innovation!”
Re: Analysis of economic and productivity losses caused by cookie banners in Europe
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
It did though? You don't need a banner for actually legitimate use (session Cookie, settings, etc) The things they're calling legitimate use just isn't, which is why they need banners.
The elephant in the room is that almost no one wants to host website without at least some sort of website analytics service, which does not fall under legitimate use. So that's why even a small blog is going to have a cookie banner. There are some analytics companies out there that advertise cookieless analytics, but they are either a) too simple for enterprise or b) a much, much worse privacy and compliance risk.
It's admittedly sound advice to create a banner for such a usecase however, as sanitizing all user data from these events is hard to guarantee, and you'd have to do just that to keep it legal
Re: Analysis of economic and productivity losses caused by cookie banners in Europe
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
What does "for that analysis" refers to? Fraud prevention? If so, it is legitimate interest to do fraud prevention, so there's no need for a consent banner, first or third-party. Naturally you can't go and use this data for a purpose that has no basis under legitimate interest. Another example: Cloudflare is running DDoS prevention under our noses here at HN, for example, but there's no need to ask for consent, even…
> What does "for that analysis" To understand how customer's shop on my website. Heatmaps, view port, device type, screen resolution, frequency of browsing, where their mouse hovers the most, page dwell time, etc. These are impossible tasks for most website operators to do themselves. > For this you do need consent, if you transfer PII. If you don't want a banner you can replace it with a simple checkbox during the c…
Re: Analysis of economic and productivity losses caused by cookie banners in Europe
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
What does "for that analysis" refers to? Fraud prevention? If so, it is legitimate interest to do fraud prevention, so there's no need for a consent banner, first or third-party. Naturally you can't go and use this data for a purpose that has no basis under legitimate interest. Another example: Cloudflare is running DDoS prevention under our noses here at HN, for example, but there's no need to ask for consent, even…
> What does "for that analysis" To understand how customer's shop on my website. Heatmaps, view port, device type, screen resolution, frequency of browsing, where their mouse hovers the most, page dwell time, etc. These are impossible tasks for most website operators to do themselves. > For this you do need consent, if you transfer PII. If you don't want a banner you can replace it with a simple checkbox during the c…
As for the rest, it's quite inflammatory and I don't know how it relates to my comment, so I'll refrain from answering.
Re: Analysis of economic and productivity losses caused by cookie banners in Europe
#159Re: Analysis of economic and productivity losses caused by cookie banners in Europe
#160People blame the cookie banners themselves or the legislation that "made them necessary" but somehow never seem to blame the web companies for doing the naughty things on their websites that make them subject to the law. The "cookie banner problem" exists because it's primarily end users that are shouldering the burden of them, and not the companies. For the company, it's a one time JIRA ticket for a junior software…