if i had a 2560x1440 display, i'd use four 80 character wide tiled windows.
Is the 80 character line limit still relevant? (2008)
151–160 of 180 posts
Re: Is the 80 character line limit still relevant? (2008)
#152Just because some people like to have a single pane of text cover their entire 16:9 display doesn’t mean I should have to. I find very vertical text much easier to follow. Wide lines are usually wide due to nesting and chaining, either of blocks or of inline expressions. Both are a thing which should not be. Concisely and clearly define one concept or abstraction. Then, use it in the next definition. This isn’t hard!…
Re: Is the 80 character line limit still relevant? (2008)
#153An 80 character limit is difficult to stay within when using highly descriptive variable names, and I think the benefits of highly descriptive variable names outweigh other considerations.
Perhaps instead of using highly descriptive variable names, use reasonably descriptive variable names? Names that are too long impair readability rather than helping it. You want names that are as long as necessary to meaningfully, semantically distinguish identifiers in a given context, but not any longer.
Re: Is the 80 character line limit still relevant? (2008)
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
I like to put a haikus in spots like this: // Empty by choice // Use the Prettier defaults // No customized rules Taking the time to write a specific one gives added weight to the decision to use the defaults as anyone adding a rule has to remove the haiku.
haiku: "empty by choice" is only 4 syllables
Re: Is the 80 character line limit still relevant? (2008)
#155Re: Is the 80 character line limit still relevant? (2008)
#156One thing I find sad is that of the 4 IDEs that I work with, most of which have an option to break done long line into several multiple line equivalents, none allow to do a word wrap smarter than that of notepad. They already implemented the refactoring tool, using it in rendering would probably not be a far fetch. That would allow us to get past handling line breaks manually and the invariant discussions and review…
That is a lot of IDEs! Why not use IntelliJ for everything... Or Eclipse or Visual Studio Code? I am pretty sure all three are uber polyglot at this point.
Re: Is the 80 character line limit still relevant? (2008)
#157Just because some people like to have a single pane of text cover their entire 16:9 display doesn’t mean I should have to. I find very vertical text much easier to follow. Wide lines are usually wide due to nesting and chaining, either of blocks or of inline expressions. Both are a thing which should not be. Concisely and clearly define one concept or abstraction. Then, use it in the next definition. This isn’t hard!…
Re: Is the 80 character line limit still relevant? (2008)
#158Just because some people like to have a single pane of text cover their entire 16:9 display doesn’t mean I should have to. I find very vertical text much easier to follow. Wide lines are usually wide due to nesting and chaining, either of blocks or of inline expressions. Both are a thing which should not be. Concisely and clearly define one concept or abstraction. Then, use it in the next definition. This isn’t hard!…
Here you go, munch on a punch-card.
You know, there’s a reason cars and trains are the width that they are.
Re: Is the 80 character line limit still relevant? (2008)
#159Just because some people like to have a single pane of text cover their entire 16:9 display doesn’t mean I should have to. I find very vertical text much easier to follow. Wide lines are usually wide due to nesting and chaining, either of blocks or of inline expressions. Both are a thing which should not be. Concisely and clearly define one concept or abstraction. Then, use it in the next definition. This isn’t hard!…
I don't mind an 80 or 100 character limit on code, but it boggles my mind that we're still inserting line breaks in comment blocks. Like, if you can't figure out how to get your editor to line-wrap comments then you're in the wrong business.
Re: Is the 80 character line limit still relevant? (2008)
#160Just because some people like to have a single pane of text cover their entire 16:9 display doesn’t mean I should have to. I find very vertical text much easier to follow. Wide lines are usually wide due to nesting and chaining, either of blocks or of inline expressions. Both are a thing which should not be. Concisely and clearly define one concept or abstraction. Then, use it in the next definition. This isn’t hard!…
I don't mind an 80 or 100 character limit on code, but it boggles my mind that we're still inserting line breaks in comment blocks. Like, if you can't figure out how to get your editor to line-wrap comments then you're in the wrong business.
For instance, I think prose is hard to read when you have to scan long horizontal distances from line to line.
However, code often has indentation, syntax, and chains (e.g. nested property access) that take up a lot of width before the actual information is presented, so width is more helpful.