Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI to become for-profit company

reuters.com

151–160 of 809 posts

Re: OpenAI to become for-profit company

#151
post #50
post #40

Lot of people unhappy about this yet not at all unhappy (or even caring) about the 1,000s of others who started out for profit. And while we're all here hacking away (we're hackers, right?) many of us with startups, what is it we're chasing? Profit, money, time, control. Are we different except in scale? Food for thought.

How is this food for thought? OpenAI had an unfair advantage by starting out as a non-profit.

What stopped others doing this? Or is stopping others doing this?

Re: OpenAI to become for-profit company

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm ignorant on this topic so please excuse me. Why did `AI` happen now? What was the secret sauce that OpenAI did that seemed to make this explode into being all of a sudden? My general impression was that the concept of 'how it works' existed for a long time, it was only recently that video cards had enough VRAM to hold the matrix(?) within memory to do the necessary calculations. If anybody knows, not just the per…

Mostly branding and willingness. w.r.t. Branding. AI has been happening "forever". While "machine learning" or "genetic algorithms" were more of the rage pre-LLMs that doesn't mean people weren't using them. It's just Google Search didn't brand their search engine as "powered by ML". AI is everywhere now because everything already used AI and now the products as "Spellcheck With AI" instead of just "Spellcheck". w.r.…

There's a deleted scene from Terminator 2 (1991) where we get a description of the neural network behind Skynet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UZeHJyiMG8

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skynet_(Terminator)

Re: OpenAI to become for-profit company

#153

The fact that this has just disappeared from the front page for me, just like the previous post ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41651548 ), somehow leaves a bitter taste in my mouth.

I found this on the front page an hour after you made this comment.

Re: OpenAI to become for-profit company

#154
post #132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even if the knock-on effect is "all the artists and thinkers who contributed to the uncompensated free training set give up and stop creating new stuff"?

If an "artist" or "thinker" stops because of this, I question their motivations and those labels in the first place.

Everyone tends to have "be able to afford basic necessities" as a major motivation. That includes people who work in creative fields.

Re: OpenAI to become for-profit company

#156
post #48
post #40

Lot of people unhappy about this yet not at all unhappy (or even caring) about the 1,000s of others who started out for profit. And while we're all here hacking away (we're hackers, right?) many of us with startups, what is it we're chasing? Profit, money, time, control. Are we different except in scale? Food for thought.

I see your point but I think it's fine to be angry and disappointed that an outfit that appeared to be trying to do it differently has abandoned the effort.

Perhaps it's the only way to survive?

And what comes first, the mission, or being able to tell people you did your best but failed to build the thing you set out to build?

Perhaps most of us are more interested in fairness than progress, and that's fine.

Re: OpenAI to become for-profit company

#158
Not the only one questioning.

Going for-Profit, and several top exec leaving at same time? Before getting the money?

"""Question: why would key people leave an organization right before it was just about to develop AGI?" asked xAI developer Benjamin De Kraker in a post on X just after Murati's announcement. "This is kind of like quitting NASA months before the moon landing," he wrote in a reply. "Wouldn't you wanna stick around and be part of it?"""

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/09/opena...

Is this the beginning of the end for OpenAI?

Re: OpenAI to become for-profit company

#159
post #40

Lot of people unhappy about this yet not at all unhappy (or even caring) about the 1,000s of others who started out for profit. And while we're all here hacking away (we're hackers, right?) many of us with startups, what is it we're chasing? Profit, money, time, control. Are we different except in scale? Food for thought.

Your food is undercooked

That's a little unfair.

If you don't mind me asking, what generation are you from? Perchance you're newer than me to Earth, among those who find it hard that others have different opinions?

Re: OpenAI to become for-profit company

#160

The most surprising thing to me in this is that the non-profit will still exist. Not sure what the point of it is anymore. Taken as a whole, OpenAI is now just a for-profit entity beholden to investors and Sam Altman as a shareholder. The non-profit is really just vestigial. I guess technically it's supposed to play some role in making sure OpenAI "benefits humanity". But as we've seen multiple times, whenever that g…

The non-profit side is just there to attract talent and encourage them to work harder b/c it's for humanity. Obviously people sniffed out the facts, realized it was all for profit and that lead to an exodus.

Funnily, I think all the non-profit motivated talent has left, and the people left behind are those who stand to (and want to) make a killing when OpenAI becomes a for-profit. And that talent is in the majority - nothing else would explain the show of support for Altman when he was kicked out.
Post reply on HN