Live data from Hacker News

Apple Quietly Pulls Claims of Virus Immunity

pcworld.com

151–154 of 154 posts

Re: Apple Quietly Pulls Claims of Virus Immunity

#151
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most BSDs aren't running stuff like Bonjour which increases exposure to the network.

Bonjour is just Apple's name for zero config networking which most Linux and BSD distributions do support to various degrees.

I was under the impression it also did file server and printer discovery among other things. I know OpenBSD doesn't do that out of the box.

Re: Apple Quietly Pulls Claims of Virus Immunity

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

EFI is not exclusive to Macs. It was developed by Intel and has been deprecated in favor of UEFI. Most UEFI images will have legacy support for BIOS services. There is basically no difference between a modern Mac and a PC - except for Mac OS X, which can be run on "Hackintoshes".

> EFI is not exclusive to Macs. Which is beside the pedantic point, that to be an "IBM PC compatible" you have to NOT run EFI.

And yet the PC clone market as a whole appears to be moving over to EFI

Re: Apple Quietly Pulls Claims of Virus Immunity

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was under the impression that since Macs went over to x86, they were capable of running Windows. They are IBM PC compatible.

I think the only difference now is that Macs use EFI boot, and not BIOS boot and hence will only boot software with a EFI-boot compatible bootloader. Once you get past that step a Mac works exactly like a "PC". Just like a "PC" works exactly like a Mac if you fake the EFI-boot via a custom BIOS-to-EFI bootloader on a USB-stick.

That was fixed with firmware updates soon after release of the first Intel Macs.

Re: Apple Quietly Pulls Claims of Virus Immunity

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> EFI is not exclusive to Macs. Which is beside the pedantic point, that to be an "IBM PC compatible" you have to NOT run EFI.

And yet the PC clone market as a whole appears to be moving over to EFI

So they appear to be moving over to "not being IBM PC compatible". Which is perfectly valid.

I never said that PCs are called PCs because they ARE IBM PC compatible, only said they are called PCs because in the past "IBM PC compatible" defined their category.

Post reply on HN