Live data from Hacker News

Bradford pear trees banned in few states – More are looking to eradicate them

usatoday.com

151–154 of 154 posts

Re: Bradford pear trees banned in few states – More are looking to eradicate them

#151
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

they're also available at a local walmart as rootstock. I bought one. If i find a nursery that has it i will buy more, but i like growing "weird" plants that no one has heard of, like soapberries, kumquats, that sort of thing.

Lookup beauty berries. Their fruit is edible and makes a nice jam. True to their name, they’re beautiful when fruiting.

Birds have their own plans for the Callicarpa berries, but are excellent plants for dry shadow. And leaves take a rare true-pink tone in fall.

Re: Bradford pear trees banned in few states – More are looking to eradicate them

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apparently this is no longer much of an issue. Quoting [0]: "The federal ban was lifted in 1966, though many states maintained their own bans. Research showed that blackcurrants could be safely grown some distance from white pines and this, together with the development of rust-immune varieties and new fungicides, led to most states lifting their bans by 2003. Blackcurrants are now grown commercially in the Northeast…

they're also available at a local walmart as rootstock. I bought one. If i find a nursery that has it i will buy more, but i like growing "weird" plants that no one has heard of, like soapberries, kumquats, that sort of thing.

Can I recommend Saskatoon berries; they've a nice nutty taste, great for jam, and dog safe.

Re: Bradford pear trees banned in few states – More are looking to eradicate them

#154
post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I've never been very fond of nature to begin with > [0] - Specifically at human/humane, live in and breathe in and admire it scale. I'm very fond of nature at population scale, and at molecular scale, both of which present interesting puzzles and applications. I can relate to this a lot. I feel the same way about nature as I do about a tiger or a volcano; I think they're cool and I respect them, but I don't care to…

At risk of being pedantic, tigers and volcanoes are nature.

I don't see why it's inconsistent for me to feel similarly about a small part of something as I do about the whole, or why it might not be rhetorically useful to help explain something by drawing a comparison between them
Post reply on HN