Live data from Hacker News

'We had to educate Oracle about our contract,' CIO says after Big Red audit

theregister.com

151–152 of 152 posts

Re: 'We had to educate Oracle about our contract,' CIO says after Big Red audit

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, all of this Oracle Java licensing drama only applies if you're using the Oracle JDK. The vast majority of people can just use a JDK from any of the other vendors and tell Oracle to pound sand. Even if you do need paid support, you should pay Azul instead of Oracle, just out of principle.

> Even if you do need paid support By paid support, you mean free steak dinners for middle management? After dealing with Azul people, give me Oracle. Instead of seeing Azul people shuffling a bunch of charts around and making up shit on the fly to make it sound like their garbage product performs better than OpenJDK (it didn't for us. we benchmarked it. but shame on us, because I guess the steak dinners kept rolling…

We have a contract with Azul that allows us to report bugs with the expectation they are fixed. We can and do use this ability.

Re: 'We had to educate Oracle about our contract,' CIO says after Big Red audit

#152
post #130
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not in MySQL. DDL is not transacted last time I looked Postgres is a great choice over Oracle these days though

Yeah, well MySQL or Oracle aren't the only database choices you have. And those two aren't even a choice between Oracle and something else. Both are Oracle the company properties now. Unless you meant MariaDB or something.

Yes, my mistake, I miss-read MS SQL as MySQL. MS SQL, being derived from Sybase, fully supports transactions. I'm not a fan of the price, but it's good.
Post reply on HN