Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT for Teams

openai.com

151–160 of 453 posts

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#151
post #134

The Engineering example is absolutely hilarious. Sure, I’m going to copy paste my code into an AI assistant to ask it about a bug that a linter would spot in realtime as I wrote the code.

I agree with you completely, but the target audience of people who will do such a thing have no clue what a linter, lexer, or parser are. Maybe even a compiler. And that audience is much larger than us folks at the ripe old age of 25+ even realize.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#152

I’ve got my stuff rigged to hit mixtral-8x7, and dolphin locally, and 3.5-turbo, and the 4-series preview all with easy comparison in emacs and stuff, and in fairness the 4.5-preview is starting to show some edge on 8x7 that had been a toss-up even two weeks ago. I’m still on the mistral-medium waiting list. Until I realized Perplexity will give you a decent amount of Mistral Medium for free through their partnership…

I have 20 years of software development experience, and I couldn’t understand anything you said. Is there a dictionary for this new lingo, or am I just too mid?

respectfully, 20 yrs of software dev experience doesn't entitle you to understand the last 2 months of AI if you didn't spend the effort to keep up. jargon happens, its not your fault but also people need to communicate thoughts concisely given a base of knowledge. its ok to ask of course but the rest of us who have been keeping up can parse this well enough (even though I disagree with some of the assertions)

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have 20 years of software development experience, and I couldn’t understand anything you said. Is there a dictionary for this new lingo, or am I just too mid?

Just had to say that the original comment, and then yours right after, is a great combo. Laughed my ass off :)

Normally I'm the mid-ass, out of touch old guy, it's a rare chance to be the one using the insider lingo :)

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#154

I’ve got my stuff rigged to hit mixtral-8x7, and dolphin locally, and 3.5-turbo, and the 4-series preview all with easy comparison in emacs and stuff, and in fairness the 4.5-preview is starting to show some edge on 8x7 that had been a toss-up even two weeks ago. I’m still on the mistral-medium waiting list. Until I realized Perplexity will give you a decent amount of Mistral Medium for free through their partnership…

I have 20 years of software development experience, and I couldn’t understand anything you said. Is there a dictionary for this new lingo, or am I just too mid?

He is all over the place, mixing tech specifics with unproven models.

Basically, he said he is happy with Mistral 8x7B and thinks it is on par/better comparing to OpenAI's closed source model.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#155
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have 20 years of software development experience, and I couldn’t understand anything you said. Is there a dictionary for this new lingo, or am I just too mid?

respectfully, 20 yrs of software dev experience doesn't entitle you to understand the last 2 months of AI if you didn't spend the effort to keep up. jargon happens, its not your fault but also people need to communicate thoughts concisely given a base of knowledge. its ok to ask of course but the rest of us who have been keeping up can parse this well enough (even though I disagree with some of the assertions)

I'm snarkier than most on HN and have the scars to prove it, and I do miss the RTFM-by-default vibe of the early days, but on this one topic as you can see I'm going out of my way to apologize for being cryptic and try to include everyone in the conversation because this shit matters a lot even by our standards.

Give me a hand?

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#156
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same bro

My apologies to both you and grandparent, I faux-pass'd on using such sloppy jargon in a thread of general interest. If I can be useful in decoding some of that and helping to keep this topic accessible to the broader community I'd be happy to answer any questions about what I meant. I've cited a few useful resources elsewhere in the thread and am always eager to talk shop on topics like this, so fire away if you hav…

A paragraph by paragraph "dumbed down" translation of your original words would be pretty neat to have for starters. Both to understand what you mean but also to understand the lingo.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#157
post #142

Could a moderator change the "Teams" in the title to lowercase (as it is in the article)? Capitalizing Teams misleadingly implies it's regarding Microsoft's chat platform.

But that's how headlines work

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#158

I’ve got my stuff rigged to hit mixtral-8x7, and dolphin locally, and 3.5-turbo, and the 4-series preview all with easy comparison in emacs and stuff, and in fairness the 4.5-preview is starting to show some edge on 8x7 that had been a toss-up even two weeks ago. I’m still on the mistral-medium waiting list. Until I realized Perplexity will give you a decent amount of Mistral Medium for free through their partnership…

Dolphin-mixtral is incredible for the size that it is. But I'm curious, have you tried Goliath-120b or the new `Mixtral_34Bx2_MoE_60B` (it's named Mixtral but the base is actually Yi).

Goliath is too big for my system but Mixtral_34Bx2_MoE_60B[1] is giving me some really good results.

PSA to anyone that does not understand what we're talkign about: I was new to all of this until two weeks ago as well. If you want to get up to speed with the incredible innovation and home-tinkering happening with LLMs, you have to checkout - https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/

I believe we should be at GPT4 levels of intelligence locally sometime later this year (Possibly with the release of Llama3 or Mistral Medium open-model).

[1] - https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Mixtral_34Bx2_MoE_60B-GGUF

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#159
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

respectfully, 20 yrs of software dev experience doesn't entitle you to understand the last 2 months of AI if you didn't spend the effort to keep up. jargon happens, its not your fault but also people need to communicate thoughts concisely given a base of knowledge. its ok to ask of course but the rest of us who have been keeping up can parse this well enough (even though I disagree with some of the assertions)

I'm snarkier than most on HN and have the scars to prove it, and I do miss the RTFM-by-default vibe of the early days, but on this one topic as you can see I'm going out of my way to apologize for being cryptic and try to include everyone in the conversation because this shit matters a lot even by our standards. Give me a hand?

i do my part :) i do lots of explaining in audio and text https://latent.space/p/dec-2023

am just here to vibe in my down time

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#160
post #20

“No training on your business data or conversations” Does this mean they will still use your data for other non-training purposes?

maybe we will see "only human eyes can see your data" vs "no automated tools can see your data" in the future
Post reply on HN