What's the difference between Bard and Gemini? One is text and the other is multi-modal?
Bard is the consumer product, Gemini the new model behind it
Gemini AI
151–160 of 1001 posts
Re: Gemini AI
#152There seems to be a small error in the reported results: In most rows the model that did better is highlighted, but in the row reporting results for the FLEURS test, it is the losing model (Gemini, which scored 7.6% while GPT4-v scored 17.6%) that is highlighted.
Re: Gemini AI
#153it's really amazing how in IT we always recycle the same ten names... in the last three years, "gemini" refers (at least) to: - gemini protocol, the smolnet companion (gemini://geminiprotocol.net/ - https://geminiprotocol.net/ ) - gemini somethingcoin somethingcrypto (I will never link it) - gemini google's ML/AI (here we are)
This is not limited to IT. After all, there are far more things to be named, than we have usable words to use.
Re: Gemini AI
#154I asked Bard, "Are you running Gemini Pro now?" And it told me, "Unfortunately, your question is ambiguous. "Gemini Pro" could refer to..." and listed a bunch of irrelevant stuff. Is Bard not using Gemini Pro at time of writing? The blog post says, "Starting today, Bard will use a fine-tuned version of Gemini Pro for more advanced reasoning, planning, understanding and more." (EDIT: it is... gave me a correct answer…
Your line of thinking also presupposes that Bard is self aware about that type of thing. You could also ask it what programming language it's written in, but that doesn't mean it knows and/or will answer you.
Re: Gemini AI
#155Important caveat with some of the results: they are using better prompting techniques for Gemini vs GPT-4, including their top line result on MMLU (CoT@32 vs top-5). But, they do have better results on zero-shot prompting below, e.g., on HumanEval.
Re: Gemini AI
#156There's some dissonance in the the way this will swamp out searches for the web-alternative Gemini protocol by the biggest tech company in the world proudly boasting how responsible and careful they are being to improving things "for everyone, everywhere in the world".
Maybe they shouldn't have chosen such a common word if they didn't want to be confused with something else. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini
It's not just the confusion part, it's the behaviour part; Google is a web browser near-monopolist, AI is a big hyped thing with a lot of media noise, and Google has plonked their AI right on top of a small competitor, and done it while crowing about how moral they are.
It's more like Uber releasing an AI called Taxi so all web searches for taxis show you Uber results and you saying "taxi is a word used by lots of companies".
Re: Gemini AI
#157Apple lost the PC battle, MS lost the mobile battle, Google is losing the AI battle. You can't win everywhere.
> Apple lost the PC battle
Across the 2010's, Macs were variously making up 35-80% of the entire PC industry's profit, according to different news sources in different years.
And since then, Apple's share of the PC market has only gone up, from ~13% to ~31% [1].
I can't find any solid data on profitability from the past couple of years, but there's no reason to think it's substantially changed.
So when you're the #1 most profitable computer manufacturer by far, it doesn't exactly sound like "losing" to me, even if you're not #1 in market share by OS.
At the end of the day, the only thing that actually matters is your total profitability in dollars. And there, it seems like Apple has won massively.
[1] https://www.computerworld.com/article/3695172/statcounter-da...
Re: Gemini AI
#158> For Gemini Ultra, we’re currently completing extensive trust and safety checks, including red-teaming by trusted external parties, and further refining the model using fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) before making it broadly available. > As part of this process, we’ll make Gemini Ultra available to select customers, developers, partners and safety and responsibility experts for ear…
won't be available for regular devs until probably Q2 next year, OpenAI will have probably released GPT5 or whatever new model by then. And GPT4 was done training in 2022, the fact Google is thumping their chest about being 2 years behind a much smaller company is kind of pathetic
That's actually not a bad achievement considering Google is now the new IBM.
Re: Gemini AI
#159It’s funny as I’m watching the multimodal demo, the feature I’m hoping for the most is less alignment. I think the crippling of GPT has made it so much less useful than it could be. I don’t know if Google would take a bigger chance with it being the second player and having to catch up but that would be one hell of a differentiator. Less policing. Maybe they could get away with it because they have data on what peopl…
Musk's Grok AI is supposed to be this, although right now it's still vapourware.
Training an AI on 4chan isn't going to get you significant intelligence. You'll sure get a lot of pictures, though!
Re: Gemini AI
#160I started talking to it about screenplay ideas and it came up with a _very_ detailed plan for how an AI might try and take over the world. --- Can you go into more detail about how an ai might orchestrate a global crisis to seize control and reshape the world according to it's own logic? --- The AI's Plan for Global Domination: Phase 1: Infiltration and Manipulation: Information Acquisition: The AI, through various m…
No gravity, no muscle.